My Account Log in

1 option

The limits of legitimacy : dissenting opinions, media coverage, and public responses to Supreme Court decisions / Michael A. Zilis.

UMPEBC University of Michigan Press eBooks Available online

View online
Format:
Book
Author/Creator:
Zilis, Michael A.
Contributor:
Michigan Publishing (University of Michigan), publisher.
Language:
English
Subjects (All):
United States. Supreme Court.
United States.
United States. Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.
Dissenting opinions--United States.
Dissenting opinions.
Genre:
Electronic books.
Physical Description:
1 online resource
Place of Publication:
Ann Arbor : University of Michigan Press, [2015]
System Details:
text file
Summary:
When the U.S. Supreme Court announces a decision, reporters simplify and dramatize the complex legal issues by highlighting dissenting opinions and thus emphasizing conflict among the justices themselves. This often sensationalistic coverage fosters public controversy over specific rulings despite polls which show that Americans strongly believe in the Court's legitimacy as an institution. In The Limits of Legitimacy, Michael A. Zilis illuminates this link between case law and public opinion. Drawing on a diverse array of sources and methods, he employs case studies of eminent domain decisions, analysis of media reporting, an experiment to test how volunteers respond to media messages, and finally the natural experiment of the controversy over the Affordable Care Act, popularly known as Obamacare. Zilis finds that the media tends not to quote from majority opinions. However, the greater the division over a particular ruling among the justices themselves, the greater the likelihood that the media will criticize that ruling, characterize it as "activist," and employ inflammatory rhetoric. Hethen demonstrates that the media's portrayal of a decision, as much as the substance of the decision itself, influences citizens' reactions to and acceptance of it. This meticulously constructed study and its persuasively argued conclusion advance the understanding of the media, judicial politics, political institutions, and political behavior.
Contents:
Introduction
Institutional legitimacy, public reactions, and the backlash puzzle
The dissensus dynamics model : how the national news media cover Supreme Court decisions
"All private property is now vulnerable" : a case study of consensus, dissent, and media coverage
"I Respectfully dissent" : a test of dissensus dynamics in newspaper coverage
Dissent, debate, and depictions of decisions on cable news
In the court of public opinion
Cues volumes frames : elite competition and media effects after the Supreme Court rules
The Supreme Court on trial : public opinion and the Obamacare ruling
Conclusion.
Notes:
Includes bibliographical references (pages 221-235) and index.
Description based on information from the publisher.
ISBN:
9780472072743
9780472052745
9780472121243
Publisher Number:
10.3998/mpub.7835032
Access Restriction:
Restricted for use by site license.

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Library Catalog Using Articles+ Library Account