My Account Log in

3 options

Against the death penalty / Justice Stephen Breyer ; edited by John Bessler.

EBSCOhost Academic eBook Collection (North America) Available online

View online

Ebook Central Academic Complete Available online

View online

Ebook Central College Complete Available online

View online
Format:
Book
Author/Creator:
Breyer, Stephen G., 1938- author.
Contributor:
Bessler, John D., editor, writer of introduction.
Bloomsbury (Firm), publisher.
Language:
English
Subjects (All):
Capital punishment.
Capital punishment--United States.
United States.
Genre:
Court decisions and opinions.
Physical Description:
1 online resource (174 pages)
Edition:
1st ed.
Distribution:
New York : Bloomsbury Publishing(US), 2016.
Place of Publication:
Washington, D.C. : Brookings Institution Press, [2016]
Summary:
"A landmark dissenting opinion arguing against the death penalty Does the death penalty violate the Constitution? In Against the Death Penalty, Justice Stephen G. Breyer argues that it does: that it is carried out unfairly and inconsistently, and thus violates the ban on "cruel and unusual punishments" specified by the Eighth Amendment to the Constitution. "Today's administration of the death penalty," Breyer writes, "involves three fundamental constitutional defects: (1) serious unreliability, (2) arbitrariness in application, and (3) unconscionably long delays that undermine the death penalty's penological purpose. Perhaps as a result, (4) most places within the United States have abandoned its use." This volume contains Breyer's dissent in the case of Glossip v. Gross, which involved an unsuccessful challenge to Oklahoma's use of a lethal-injection drug because it might cause severe pain. Justice Breyer's legal citations have been edited to make them understandable to a general audience, but the text retains the full force of his powerful argument that the time has come for the Supreme Court to revisit the constitutionality of the death penalty. Breyer was joined in his dissent from the bench by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Their passionate argument has been cited by many legal experts - including fellow Justice Antonin Scalia - as signaling an eventual Court ruling striking down the death penalty. A similar dissent in 1963 by Breyer's mentor, Justice Arthur J. Goldberg, helped set the stage for a later ruling, imposing what turned out to be a four-year moratorium on executions"-- Provided by publisher.
Contents:
Front Cover; Front Flap; Title Page; Copyright Information; Table of Contents; Introduction; Justice Breyer's Dissent in Glossip V. Gross; Appendices; Notes; Index; Back Flap; Back Cover
Notes:
Includes index.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
Description based on online resource; title from digital title page (viewed on December 19, 2022).
ISBN:
0-8157-5097-8
0-8157-2890-5
OCLC:
948669357

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

Find

Home Release notes

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Find catalog Using Articles+ Using your account