2 options
Assessing, monitoring and evaluating Army security cooperation : a framework for implementation / Angela O'Mahony, Ilana Blum, Gabriela Armenta, Nicholas Burger, Joshua Mendelsohn, Michael J. McNerney, Steven W. Popper, Jefferson P. Marquis, Thomas S. Szayna.
https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/research_reports/RR2100/RR2165/RAND_RR2165.pdf Available online
View online- Format:
- Book
- Author/Creator:
- O'Mahony, Angela, author.
- Blum, Ilana, author.
- Armenta, Gabriela, author.
- Burger, Nicholas, author.
- Mendelsohn, Joshua, author.
- McNerney, Michael J., author.
- Popper, Steven W., 1953- author.
- Marquis, Jefferson P., author.
- Szayna, Thomas S., 1960- author.
- Language:
- English
- Subjects (All):
- United States. Army--Rules and practice--Evaluation.
- United States.
- United States. Army.
- Military assistance, American--Evaluation.
- Military assistance, American.
- Security sector.
- Parliamentary practice.
- Evaluation.
- Physical Description:
- xxviii, 171 pages : illustrations ; 28 cm
- polychrome
- Place of Publication:
- Santa Monica, Calif : Rand Corporation, 2018.
- System Details:
- text file
- Summary:
- The U.S. Army conducts security cooperation activities with partner nations to achieve several objectives, including building relationships that promote U.S. security interests and developing partners' capabilities for self-defense and multinational operations. Evaluating the effectiveness of these activities, however, has been difficult. To examine this issue, this report addresses two questions: when can Army security cooperation have the greatest impact, and how should the Army assess, monitor, and evaluate security cooperation? The authors conducted a literature review of both security cooperation and international development assistance studies; they identified factors corresponding to when assistance was provided and where it was effective. They followed this up with a statistical analysis in which they reviewed more than 9,000 security cooperation activities conducted between 2009 and 2014 for how well they aligned with lessons learned from the literature review. They found that Army security cooperation generally favors countries in need of greater engagement, countries with which the United States would like to improve relations, and countries for which engagement will be the most productive. And while Army security cooperation activities have aligned fairly well with what previous analyses have found contribute to effectiveness in both security cooperation and international development assistance, the lack of systematic assessment, monitoring, and evaluation across activities makes it difficult to know whether the activities effectively met their objectives. Thus, the authors present a framework and portfolio tool to help the Army implement an assessment, monitoring, and evaluation process that is in line with current Army doctrine and emerging guidance from the Department of Defense.
- Contents:
- Part one. Understanding Army security cooperation effectiveness.
- Chapter one. Introduction.
- Chapter two. Lessons from security cooperation and international development assistance.
- Chapter three. Army security cooperation empirics.
- Part two. Implementing an Army AM&E framework.
- Chapter four. AM&E developments and implications for the Army.
- Chapter five. Good practices in development AM&E.
- Chapter six. Framework for assessing, monitoring, and evaluating Army security cooperation.
- Chapter seven. Pilot tool for evaluating security cooperation portfolios.
- Chapter eight. Conclusion.
- Appendixes.
- References.
- Notes:
- Includes bibliographical references (pages 161-171).
- ISBN:
- 0833099418
- 9780833099419
- OCLC:
- 1044836844
The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.