1 option
Debating procreation : is it wrong to reproduce? / David Benatar and David Wasserman.
- Format:
- Book
- Author/Creator:
- Benatar, David, author.
- Wasserman, David T., author.
- Language:
- English
- Subjects (All):
- Human reproduction--Moral and ethical aspects.
- Human reproduction.
- Life--Moral and ethical aspects.
- Life.
- Quality of life.
- Reproductive Rights--ethics.
- Reproductive Behavior--ethics.
- Quality of Life.
- Wrongful Life--ethics.
- Medical Subjects:
- Reproductive Rights--ethics.
- Reproductive Behavior--ethics.
- Quality of Life.
- Wrongful Life--ethics.
- Physical Description:
- 1 online resource
- Other Title:
- Is it wrong to reproduce?
- Place of Publication:
- New York : Oxford University Press, 2015.
- Summary:
- In this volume, two authors debate the ethics of procreation. One argues for the anti-natalist view that procreation is never morally permissible. In support of that conclusion he advances a number of arguments. In the second half of the book, the second author identifies a variety of moderate pro-natalist positions, which all see procreation as sometimes permissible but never required.
- Contents:
- Anti-natalism / by David Benatar
- Introducing anti-natalism
- The asymmetry argument
- The quality of life argument
- The misanthropic argument
- Contra procreation
- Pro-natalism / by David Wasserman
- Better to have lived and lost?
- Against anti-natalism
- The good of the future child and the parent-child relationship as goals of procreation
- Impersonal constraints on procreation
- Alternatives to impersonal approaches: birthrights and role-based duties.
- Notes:
- Includes bibliographical references and index.
- Description based on online resource; title from home page (viewed on April 28, 2015).
- ISBN:
- 0-19-024957-9
The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.