Commonsense consequentialism : wherein morality meets rationality / Douglas W. Portmore.

Format:

Book

Author/Creator:

Portmore, Douglas W., author.

Series:

Oxford moral theory.

Oxford moral theory

Language:

English

Subjects (All):

Consequentialism (Ethics).

Ethics.

Practical reason.

Physical Description:

1 online resource (xx, 266 pages).

Other Title:

Wherein morality meets rationality

Place of Publication:

Oxford ; New York : Oxford University Press, [2011]

Language Note:

English

Summary:

Commonsense Consequentialism is a book about morality, rationality, and the interconnections between the two. In it, Douglas W. Portmore defends a version of consequentialism that both comports with our commonsense moral intuitions and shares with other consequentialist theories the same compelling teleological conception of practical reasons. Broadly construed, consequentialism is the view that an act's deontic status is determined by how its outcome ranks relative to those of the available alternatives on some evaluative ranking. Portmore argues that outcomes should be ranked, not according

Contents:

Cover; Contents; Acknowledgments; Abbreviations; 1. Why I Am Not a Utilitarian; 1.1 UTILITARIANISM: THE GOOD, THE BAD, AND THE UGLY; 1.2 THE PLAN FOR THE REST OF THE BOOK; 1.3 MYAIMS; 1.4 OBJECTIVE OUGHTS AND OBJECTIVE REASONS; 1.5 CONVENTIONS THAT I WILL FOLLOW THROUGHOUT THE BOOK; 2. Consequentialism and Moral Rationalism; 2.1 THE TOO-DEMANDING OBJECTION : HOW MORAL RATIONALISM LEADS US TO REJECT UTILITARIANISM; 2.2 THE ARGUMENT AGAINST UTILITARIANISM FROM MORAL RATIONALISM; 2.3 HOW MORAL RATIONALISM COMPELS US TO ACCEPT CONSEQUENTIALISM; 2.4 WHAT IS CONSEQUENTIALISM?

2.5 THE PRESUMPTIVE CASE FOR MORAL RATIONALISM2.6 SOME CONCLUDING REMARKS; 3. The Teleological Conception of Practical Reasons; 3.1 GETTING CLEAR ON WHAT THE VIEW IS; 3.2 CLEARING UP SOME MISCONCEPTIONS ABOUT THE VIEW; 3.3 SCANLON'S PUTATIVE COUNTEREXAMPLES TO THE VIEW; 3.4 ARGUMENTS FOR THE VIEW; 4. Consequentializing Commonsense Morality; 4.1 HOW TO CONSEQUENTIALIZE; 4.2 THE DEONTIC EQUIVALENCE THESIS

4.3 BEYOND THE DEONTIC EQUIVALENCE THESIS : HOW CONSEQUENTIALIST THEORIES CAN DO A BETTER JOB OF ACCOUNTING FOR OUR CONSIDERED MORAL CONVICTIONS THAN EVEN SOME NONCONSEQUENTIALIST THEORIES CAN4.4 THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE DEONTIC EQUIVALENCE THESIS; 4.5 AN OBJECTION; 5. Dual-Ranking Act-Consequentialism: Reasons, Morality, and Overridingness ; 5.1 SOME QUICK CLARIFICATIONS; 5.2 MORAL REASONS, OVERRIDINGNESS, AND AGENT-CENTERED OPTIONS; 5.3 MORAL REASONS, OVERRIDINGNESS, AND SUPEREROGATION; 5.4 A META-CRITERION OF RIGHTNESS AND HOW IT LEADS US TO ADOPT DUAL-RANKING ACT-CONSEQUENTIALISM

5.5 NORCROSS'S OBJECTION5.6 SPLAWN'S OBJECTION; 5.7 VIOLATIONS OF THE TRANSITIVITY AND INDEPENDENCE AXIOMS; 6. Imperfect Reasons and Rational Options; 6.1 KAGAN'S OBJECTION: ARE WE SACRIFICING RATIONAL OPTIONS TO GET MORAL OPTIONS?; 6.2 IMPERFECT REASONS AND RATIONAL OPTIONS; 6.3 SECURITISM; 6.4 SECURITISM AND THE BASIC BELIEF; 6.5 SECURITISM'S SUPPOSITIONS AND IMPLICATIONS; 7. Commonsense Consequentialism; 7.1 THE BEST VERSION OF ACT-UTILITARIANISM: COMMONSENSE UTILITARIANISM; 7.2 SECURITIST CONSEQUENTIALISM AND THE ARGUMENT FOR IT

7.3 COMMONSENSE CONSEQUENTIALISM AND HOW IT COMPARES WITH TRADITIONAL ACT-CONSEQUENTIALISM7.4 WHAT HAS BEEN SHOWN AND WHAT REMAINS TO BE SHOWN; Glossary; A; B; C; D; E; G; I; J; K; M; N; O; P; R; S; T; U; V; References; Index; A; B; C; D; E; F; G; H; I; J; K; L; M; N; O; P; Q; R; S; T; U; V; W; Z

Notes:

Description based upon print version of record.

Includes bibliographical references (pages 251-257) and index.

Description based on print version record.

Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources.

ISBN:

0-19-939645-0

1-283-42316-2

9786613423160

0-19-979468-5

OCLC:

773934129