3 options
The death penalty in America : current controversies / edited by Hugo Adam Bedau.
- Format:
- Book
- Series:
- Oxford paperbacks
- Language:
- English
- Subjects (All):
- Capital punishment--United States.
- Capital punishment.
- Physical Description:
- 1 online resource (xvii, 524p. ) ill.
- Edition:
- 1st ed.
- Place of Publication:
- New York : Oxford University Press, 1997.
- Language Note:
- English
- Summary:
- This is a comprehensive sourcebook on the death penalty in America. It follows up on Bedau's "Death Penalty in America", third edition. It includes new readings, updated statistical and research data, recent Supreme Court decisions, and contributions to the debate over capital punishment.
- This is a comprehensive sourcebook on the death penalty in America. It follows up on, though is much more than a revision of, Bedau's Death Penalty in America, third edition (OUP, 1982). Virtually all the readings are new, and include updated statistical and research data, recent Supreme Court decisions, and major recent contributions to the debate over capital punishment.
- Contents:
- Cover
- CONTENTS
- TABLES
- FIGURES
- 1 Background and Developments
- Part I: The Laws, the Crimes, and the Executions
- 2 Offenses Punishable by Death
- 3 Proposed State Death Penalty Legislation, 1994
- 4 Criminal Homicide
- 5 Death Row Prisoners
- 6 The Status of the Death Penalty Worldwide
- Part II: The Controversy over Public Support for the Death Penalty: The Death Penalty versus Life Imprisonment
- 7 Hardening of the Attitudes: Americans' Views on the Death Penalty
- 8 Sentencing for Life: Americans Embrace Alternatives to the Death Penalty
- Part III: The Controversy over Deterrence and Incapacitation
- 9 Murder, Capital Punishment, and Deterrence: A Review of the Literature
- 10 A National Study of the Furman-Commuted Inmates: Assessing the Threat to Society from Capital Offenders
- 11 Prison Homicides, Recidivist Murder, and Life Imprisonment
- Part IV: The Controversy over Constitutionality
- 12 Furman v. Georgia, 1972: The Death Penalty as Administered Is Unconstitutional
- 13 Gregg v. Georgia, 1976: The Death Penalty Is Not Per Se Unconstitutional
- 14 Woodson v. North Carolina, 1976: Mandatory Death Penalties Are Unconstitutional
- 15 Coker v. Georgia, 1977: The Death Penalty for Rape Is Unconstitutional
- 16 Constitutional Interpretation, History, and the Death Penalty
- 17 Why the Death Penalty Is a Cruel and Unusual Punishment
- 18 Habeas Corpus and Other Constitutional Controversies
- 19 International Human Rights Law and the Death Penalty in America
- Part V: The Controversy over Race and Class
- 20 McCleskey v. Kemp, 1987: A Racially Disproportionate Death Penalty System Is Not Unconstitutional
- 21 Death Penalty Sentencing: Research Indicates Pattern of Racial Disparities
- 22 Counsel for the Poor: The Death Sentence Not for the Worst Crime but for the Worst Lawyer.
- Part VI: Controversies from Prosecution to Execution
- 23 "A Good Murder
- 24 How American Juries Decide Death Penalty Cases: The Capital Jury Project
- 25 Innocence and the Death Penalty: Assessing the Danger of Mistaken Executions
- 26 An Appeal for Clemency: The Case of Harold Lament Otey
- 27 To See or Not to See: Televising Executions
- 28 Witness to Another Execution
- 29 Millions Misspent: What Politicians Don't Say About the High Costs of the Death Penalty
- Part VII: The Death Penalty: For and Against
- 30 The New Testament and Moral Arguments for Capital Punishment
- 31 Noah's Covenant, the New Testament, and Christian Social Order
- 32 The Death Penalty Once More
- 33 A Reply to van den Haag
- BIBLIOGRAPHY
- TABLE OF CASES
- INDEX
- A
- B
- C
- D
- E
- F
- G
- H
- I
- J
- K
- L
- M
- N
- O
- P
- Q
- R
- S
- T
- U
- V
- W
- X
- Y
- Z.
- Notes:
- Originally published: 1997.
- Includes bibliographical references and index.
- Description based on metadata supplied by the publisher and other sources.
- ISBN:
- 0-19-028408-0
- 1-283-84858-9
- 0-19-976142-6
- OCLC:
- 922903917
The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.