My Account Log in

1 option

A world of our own : climate change advocacy in the Anthropocene / Rowan Howard-Williams.

Annenberg Library - Theses P002 2017 .H8533
Loading location information...

Available This item is available for access.

Log in to request item
Format:
Book
Manuscript
Thesis/Dissertation
Author/Creator:
Howard-Williams, Rowan, author.
Contributor:
Kraidy, Marwan M., 1972- degree supervisor.
Delli Carpini, Michael X., 1953- degree committee member.
Yang, Guobin, degree committee member.
University of Pennsylvania. Department of Communication, degree granting institution.
Language:
English
Subjects (All):
Penn dissertations--Communication.
Communication--Penn dissertations.
Local Subjects:
Penn dissertations--Communication.
Communication--Penn dissertations.
Physical Description:
viii, 285 leaves : illustrations ; 29 cm
Production:
[Philadelphia, Pennsylvania] : University of Pennsylvania, 2017.
Summary:
The effects of human impacts on the environment are often not comprehensible to people and have to be given meaning through communication. Such impacts, most prominently climate change, have increased to the extent that human actions are the dominant force in planetary biophysical systems. Yet these impacts are for the most part unintentional and not subject to democratic control. A critical discourse analysis of campaign material and media content examines how three advocacy groups--350, a climate activist organization, The Breakthrough Institute, a think-tank, and The Nature Conservancy, an established conservation organization--discursively construct climate change. The three groups acknowledge the need to more consciously or deliberatively manage environmental impacts, and yet all have very different assumptions, objectives and tactics in their advocacy. Analysis of the communication activities of the organizations and how their ideas are represented and contested in other media shows not only how they construct the particular issue of climate change but their relationship to societal power relationships. How the organizations build their case for action involves discursive acts which define or re-define the boundaries between nature and society and what (and who) is to be included or excluded from political concern. Unless directly challenged, these new formations will reproduce existing power structures and inequalities.
Notes:
Ph. D. University of Pennsylvania 2017.
Department: Communication.
Supervisor: Marwan M. Kraidy.
Includes bibliographical references.
OCLC:
1334673372

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

Find

Home Release notes

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Find catalog Using Articles+ Using your account