My Account Log in

1 option

No morality, no self : Anscombe's radical skepticism / James Doyle.

LIBRA B1618.A574 D69 2018
Loading location information...

Available from offsite location This item is stored in our repository but can be checked out.

Log in to request item
Format:
Book
Author/Creator:
Doyle, James, 1963 November 18- author.
Language:
English
Subjects (All):
Anscombe, G. E. M. (Gertrude Elizabeth Margaret).
Anscombe, G. E. M.
Ethics--Philosophy.
Ethics.
Self (Philosophy).
Skepticism.
Physical Description:
xi, 238 pages ; 25 cm
Place of Publication:
Cambridge, Massachusetts : Harvard University Press, [2018]
Summary:
It is becoming increasingly apparent that Elizabeth Anscombe (1919-2001), long known as a student, friend and translator of Wittgenstein, was herself one of the most important philosophers of the twentieth century. No Morality, No Self examines her two best-known papers, in which she advanced her most amazing theses. In 'Modern Moral Philosophy' (1958), she claimed that the term moral, understood as picking out a special, sui generis category, is literally senseless and should therefore be abandoned. In 'The First Person' (1975), she maintained that the word 'I' is not a referring expression: in other words, its function in the language is not to pick out the speaker, or 'the self' - or any entity whatsoever. Both papers are considered influential, and are frequently cited; but their main claims, and many of their arguments, have been widely misunderstood. In this book James Doyle shows that once various errors of interpretation have been cleared away, the claims can be seen to be far more plausible, and the arguments far more compelling, than even her defenders have realized. Philosophers often seek attention by making startling claims which are subsequently revealed as little more than commonplaces wrapped in hyperbole. Doyle's book makes it clear that here, in her greatest papers, Anscombe achieves something vanishingly rare in philosophy: a persuasive case for genuinely unsettling and profound conclusions. The two lines of argument, seemingly so disparate, are also shown to be connected by Anscombe's deep opposition to the Cartesian picture of the mind.-- Provided by publisher.
Contents:
Part One. No morality: "Modern moral philosophy" (1958): Virtue ethics, eudaimonism, and the Greeks
The invention of 'morality' and the possibility of consequentialism
The misguided project of vindicating morality
The futility of seeking the extension of a word with no intension
What's really wrong with the vocabulary of morality?
Assessing "Modern moral philosophy"
Part Two: No self: "the first person" (1975): The circularity problem for accounts of 'I' as a device of self-reference
Is the fundamental reference rule for 'I' the key to explaining first person self-reference?
Rumfitt's solution to the circularity problem
Can we make sense of a nonreferential account of 'I'?
Strategies for saving 'I' as a singular term: domesticating FP and deflating reference
Epilogue: The anti-cartesian basis of Anscombe's scepticism.
Notes:
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN:
9780674976504
0674976509
OCLC:
976405845

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

Find

Home Release notes

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Find catalog Using Articles+ Using your account