My Account Log in

5 options

North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) Implementation : The Future of Commercial Trucking Across the Mexican Border (RL31738) / John Frittelli.

HeinOnline U.S. Congressional Documents Library Available online

View online

HeinOnline U.S. Congressional Documents Library Available online

View online

HeinOnline U.S. Congressional Documents Library Available online

View online

HeinOnline U.S. Congressional Documents Library Available online

View online

HeinOnline U.S. International Trade Library Available online

View online
Format:
Book
Author/Creator:
Frittelli, John, author.
Series:
CRS report for Congress.
CRS report for Congress
Language:
English
Subjects (All):
Free trade--North America.
Free trade.
Physical Description:
1 online resource (28 pages).
Place of Publication:
Washington, D.C. : Congressional Research Service, 2010.
Summary:
NAFTA set forth a schedule for implementing its trucking provisions that would have opened the border states to cross-border trucking competition in 1995 and all of North America in 2000, but full implementation has been stalled because of concern with the safety of Mexican trucks. Congress first addressed these concerns in the FY2002 Department of Transportation Appropriations Act (P.L. 107-87) which set 22 safety-related preconditions for opening the border to long-haul Mexican trucks. In November 2002, the U.S. Department of Transportation announced that all the preconditions had been met and began processing Mexican applications for U.S. long-haul authority. However, a suit over environmental compliance delayed implementation further. After the suit was resolved, in February 2007, the U.S. and Mexican Secretaries of Transportation announced a demonstration project to implement the NAFTA trucking provisions. The purpose of the project was to demonstrate the ability of Mexico-based motor carriers to operate safely in the United States beyond the border commercial zones. Up to 100 Mexico- domiciled carriers would be allowed to operate throughout the United States for one year and Mexico would allow the same for up to 100 U.S.-based carriers. With passage of the U.S. Troop Readiness, Veteran's Care, Katrina Recovery, and Iraq Accountability Appropriations Act, 2007 (P.L. 110-28), Congress mandated additional requirements before the project could begin. After failing to defund the demonstration project in the FY2008 Consolidated Appropriations Act (P.L. 110-161), Congress succeeded in terminating the demonstration project through a provision in the FY2009 Omnibus Appropriations Act (P.L. 111-8). Subsequently, Mexico announced it would retaliate by increasing import duties on 90 U.S. products. The Obama Administration has indicated it intends to propose a revamped program that will address the concerns of Congress. The FY2010 Consolidated Appropriations Act (P.L. 111-117) passed in December 2009 did not preclude funds from being spent on a long-haul Mexican truck pilot program, provided the terms and conditions stipulated in section 350 of P.L. 107-87 and section 6901 of P.L. 110-28 were satisfied. One truck safety statistic, "out-of-service" rates, indicates that Mexican trucks operating in the United States are now safer than they were a decade ago. The data indicate that Mexican trucks and drivers have a comparable safety record to U.S. truckers. Another study indicates that the truck driver is usually the more critical factor in causing accidents than a safety defect with the truck itself. Service characteristics of long-haul trucking suggest that substandard carriers would likely not succeed in this market. As shipment distance increases, the relative cost of trucking compared to rail increases, and thus shippers utilizing long-haul trucking are willing to pay more because they require premium service, such as precise delivery windows or cargo refrigeration. These exacting service requirements would seem to disqualify truckers with unreliable equipment or incompetent drivers. In contrast, the short-haul "drayage" carriers that Mexican long-haul carriers would displace, typically use older equipment because of the many hours spent idling awaiting customs processing at the border. If Mexican carriers do eventually receive long-haul authority, the short term impact is expected to be gradual as Mexican firms deal with a number of stumbling blocks, including lack of prearranged back hauls and higher insurance and capital costs, in addition to the customs processing delays. In the long run, use of drayage companies is likely to decline as they lose part of their market share to Mexican long-haul carriers. The most common trips for these carriers will probably be from the Mexican interior to warehouse facilities on the U.S. side of the border or to nearby cities in the border states.
Contents:
NAFTA's Commercial Trucking Provisions: Background and Implementation History 1
Demonstration Project Results after One Year 5
Truck Safety Linkage to Service Characteristics 6
"Long-Haul" Trucking Defined 6
Short-Haul Trucking over the Border 7
Determinants of U.S. Truck Safety and Applicability to Mexican Carriers 8
Mexican Truck Out-of-Service Rates Comparable to U.S. Trucks 9
Cross-Border Trucking Operations: An Overview 11
The Scope of Cross-Border Truck Traffic 11
Cross-Border Commercial Trucking: The Trade Flow Process 13
Mexico-U.S. Crossings 13
U.S.-Mexico Crossings 14
The Maquiladora Exception 15
Hazardous Materials and Agricultural Trade 15
The Border's Distinctive Institutions: Drayage and Mexican Customs Brokers 16
Drayage: Deadheads and Bobtails 16
Mexican Customs Brokers 17
Traffic Congestion 18
Mexican Trucks Illegally Operating Beyond the Border Zone 18
The Outlook for Commercial Trucking Under NAFTA 19
The Short Term: Expectations and Limitations 19
The Short Term Prospects for Mexican Long-Haul Trucking in the United States 19
The Short Term Prospects for U.S. Long-Haul Trucking in Mexico 21
The Short Term Outlook 21
The Long Term: Business Structure and Competition 22
The Cross-Border Business Paradigm 22
The Low Cost Producer: Time and Distance Is Money 24
The Distinctive Institutions 26
Caveat 26
Congressional Issues 27
Figures
Figure 1. Incoming Truck Movements from Mexico (thousands), 1987-2007 11
Figure 2. Top Ports for Transborder Merchandise Freight by Truck: 2006 12
Tables
Table 1. Roadside Inspections of Trucks Operating in the United States by Country of
Domicile: 2004 to 2008 10
Congressional Research Service
NAFTA Implementation: The Future of Commercial Trucking Across the Mexican Border
Contacts
Author Contact Information 28.
Notes:
Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (Congressional Research Service, viewed June 9, 2023).

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

Find

Home Release notes

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Find catalog Using Articles+ Using your account