Former Soviet Union and U.S. foreign aid : implementing the assistance program, 1992-1994 / Curt Tarnoff.

Format:

Book

Author/Creator:

Tarnoff, Curt, author.

Language:

English

Subjects (All):

Economic policy.

Physical Description:

1 online resource

Place of Publication:

[Place of publication not identified] : [publisher not identified], 1995.

Summary:

This report, written in 1995, provides historical background that may be useful to Congress as it considers funding levels, types of programs, and problems in implementation of U.S. assistance to other countries. In FY1994, the new states of the former Soviet Union (FSU) collectively became the second largest recipient of U.S. foreign assistance made available from all sources, reflecting the exceptional importance attached by the U.S. Government to the region. Whether and how the assistance program is helping to bring about democratic systems and free market economies is increasingly a question of interest to Congress and the public at large. Since implementation for most of the aid program is only in its second year, it is too early to judge success or failure. However, the program has attracted widespread comment and criticism on a number of fronts. Questions include: Is the program being implemented fast enough? Although measures have been taken to speed up the process, past obstacles have included the slow pace of reform, lack of knowledge of the region, an inability to identify reformist elements, and congressional notification procedures. Is the program well-coordinated? At least 16 U.S. agencies are playing a role, making coordination a complicated and cumbersome process. It is the responsibility of the State Department's New Independent States (NIS) Coordinator to develop a strategy and allocate assistance to meet that strategy. Is assistance reaching the grassroots? Some believe that an approach favoring small non-government organizations (NGOs), volunteer programs, and exchanges is the best way to reach the people of the FSU. What is the appropriate role of U.S. consultants and contractors? Some suggest there are too many, highly paid consultants performing a questionable job. Is assistance being used for corrupt purposes? Despite the limited potential for corrupt uses of U.S. funds, concerns remain. Is U.S. assistance being used effectively? A U.S. strategy of emphasizing reformers, bringing different programs together, creating person-to-person linkages, and leveraging U.S. private sector participation suggests a coherent strategy for making U.S. assistance effective.

Notes:

Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources.