My Account Log in

1 option

American Reconstitution : How the States Stabilize American Constitutional Development / Robinson Woodward-Burns.

LIBRA JA001 2017 .W899
Loading location information...

Available from offsite location This item is stored in our repository but can be checked out.

Log in to request item
Format:
Book
Manuscript
Thesis/Dissertation
Author/Creator:
Woodward-Burns, Robinson, author.
Contributor:
Smith, Rogers, degree supervisor.
Graber, Mark A., degree committee member.
Norton, Anne, degree committee member.
University of Pennsylvania. Department of Political Science, degree granting institution.
Language:
English
Subjects (All):
Penn dissertations--Political Science.
Political Science--Penn dissertations.
Local Subjects:
Penn dissertations--Political Science.
Political Science--Penn dissertations.
Physical Description:
viii, 327 leaves : illustrations ; 29 cm
Production:
[Philadelphia, Pennsylvania] : University of Pennsylvania, 2017.
Summary:
The American Constitution is exceptionally stable. Americans have proposed and ratified only one national constitution with only twenty-seven amendments. In contrast, the American states have proposed 354 constitutions, held 250 conventions, and ratified 146 constitutions with at least 5,900 amendments. Why is the federal Constitution so much more stable than the state constitutions? Many scholars cite the federal Constitution's higher procedural barriers to revision. But this dissertation asserts that ongoing state constitutional revision resolves national constitutional controversies, preempting federal constitutional amendment and quieting national inter-branch conflict. The dissertation tests this claim in two ways. First, it compares all attempted federal and state constitutional revision since 1776, drawing on an original dataset of all proposed state constitutions to show that federal and state constitutional revision are closely associated over time. Second, the dissertation disaggregates this trend by topic, offering case studies in which state constitutional revision preempted or resolved national constitutional conflicts. Since the states constrain the scope of national constitutional controversies, one cannot fully understand the political development of the national branches or Constitution without the states.
Notes:
Ph. D. University of Pennsylvania 2017.
Department: Political Science.
Supervisor: Rogers Smith.
Includes bibliographical references.
OCLC:
1265516360

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

Find

Home Release notes

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Find catalog Using Articles+ Using your account