My Account Log in

3 options

Ensuring Language Capability in the Intelligence Community: What Factors Affect the Best Mix of Military, Civilians, and Contractors

DOAB Directory of Open Access Books Available online

View online

JSTOR Books Open Access Available online

View online

RAND Reports Available online

View online
Format:
Book
Author/Creator:
Asch, Beth J., Author.
Winkler, John D, Author.
Contributor:
Winkler, John D, Contributor.
Rand Corporation, Content Provider.
National Defense Research Institute (U.S.), Content Provider.
Language:
English
Subjects (All):
Intelligence service--Language--Employees--United States.
Intelligence service.
Multilingualism.
Intercultural communication.
Physical Description:
1 online resource
Other Title:
Ensuring Language Capability in the Intelligence Community
Place of Publication:
RAND Corporation 2013
[Place of publication not identified] RAND Corporation The 2013
Language Note:
English
Summary:
Language capability is provided in the intelligence community by military personnel, government civilians, and contractors. A key question is what is the best mix of these three types of personnel in terms of cost and effectiveness. This research draws on U.S. Department of Defense guidance and the economics and defense manpower literatures to provide a framework for broadly assessing the costs and benefits of different sources of personnel to provide a given capability, including language capabilities. The authors interviewed personnel at the National Security Agency/Central Security Service and conducted an exploratory quantitative analysis to identify the factors that may affect the best mix of language capability in the intelligence community. A key finding is that each category of personnel provides unique advantages and belongs in the IC language workforce but that a number of factors lead to civilians being a more cost-effective source of language capability than military personnel, even after accounting for the flow to the civil service of trained veterans with language capability. Policies that reduce language-training costs for military personnel and increase the flow of veterans to the civil service might help reduce this disparity.
Contents:
Introduction
DoD guidance for determining workforce mix
Literature review on the costs and benefits of different categories of personnel
Insights from interviews
Exploratory analysis of the relative cost-effectiveness of military versus civilian language-proficient workforces
Summary and concluding thoughts.
Notes:
Bibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph
ISBN:
0-8330-8193-4

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

Find

Home Release notes

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Find catalog Using Articles+ Using your account