The law of church and state : selected opinions of Justice O'Connor / Angie Welborn, Library of Congress Congressional Research Service.

Format:

Book

Government document

Author/Creator:

Welborn, Angie, author.

Library of Congress Congressional Research Service, author.

Contributor:

Library of Congress Congressional Research Service, author.

Series:

CRS report for Congress ; RS22201.

CRS report for Congress ; RS22201

Language:

English

Subjects (All):

Church and state.

Physical Description:

1 online resource (6 pages).

Place of Publication:

Washington, District of Columbia : Congressional Research Service, 2005.

Summary:

An examination of Justice O'Connor's opinions interpreting the Establishment Clause reveals that she employed different tests depending on the type of government activity at issue. She often and rather consistently applied the so-called "endorsement test" in cases involving government speech on religious topics, but tended to use hybrid approaches incorporating both the test set forth in Lemon and a neutrality test in cases involving government aid programs. The decisions show that O'Connor believed that these cases should all be examined carefully with particular attention given to the facts of each, and that the Court should refrain from tying itself to a single test for evaluating Establishment Clause cases. Justice O'Connor noted in one of her concurring opinions that "[e]xperience proves that the Establishment Clause . . . cannot easily be reduced to a single test," and that different cases "may call for different approaches."1 In cases involving "government actions targeted at particular individuals or groups, imposing special duties or giving benefits," O'Connor seemed to indicate that the neutrality test should be used, while the endorsement test would more appropriate in cases involving government speech on religious topics.2 However, she cautioned the Court against using a single unified test for evaluating all Establishment Clause claims, stating that such a test could "do more harm than good" and that a single test "risks being so vague as to be useless."3 An examination of her opinions reveals that she viewed all of the cases as very fact-specific and required careful consideration by the Court to determine whether an improper relationship existed between the government and religion. The two types of cases discussed below provide an overview of the evolution of O'Connor's reasoning in cases involving government and religion and is specifically focused on those interpreting the Establishment Clause.4 This 1 Board of Education of Kiryas Joel Village School District v. Grumet, 512 U.S. 687, 720 (1994). 2 Id at 720. 3 Id. at 718. 4 Justice O'Connor wrote many opinions, mostly concurrences, in Establishment Clause cases (continued ...) Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress.

Notes:

Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources.