Attacking Judges : How Campaign Advertising Influences State Supreme Court Elections / Melinda Gann Hall.

Format:

Book

Author/Creator:

Hall, Melinda Gann, Author.

Series:

Stanford Studies in Law and Politics

Language:

English

Subjects (All):

Advertising, Political--Law and legislation--United States.

Courts of last resort--United States--States.

Judges--United States--Election.

Political questions and judicial power--United States--States.

Judges--Election--United States.

Judges.

Advertising, Political.

Courts of last resort--States--United States.

Courts of last resort.

Political questions and judicial power--States--United States.

Political questions and judicial power.

Local Subjects:

Advertising, Political--Law and legislation--United States.

Courts of last resort--United States--States.

Judges--United States--Election.

Political questions and judicial power--United States--States.

Physical Description:

1 online resource (264 p.)

Edition:

1st ed.

Place of Publication:

Stanford, CA : Stanford University Press, [2020]

Language Note:

English

Summary:

Nasty, below-the-belt campaigns, mudslinging, and character attacks. These tactics have become part and parcel of today's election politics in America, and judicial elections are no exception. Attacking Judges takes a close look at the effects of televised advertising, including harsh attacks, on state supreme court elections. Author Melinda Gann Hall investigates whether these divisive elections have damaging consequences for representative democracy. To do this, Hall focuses on two key aspects of those elections: the vote shares of justices seeking reelection and the propensity of state electorates to vote. In doing so, Attacking Judges explores vital dimensions of the conventional wisdom that campaign politics has deleterious consequences for judges, voters, and state judiciaries. Countering the prevailing wisdom with empirically based conclusions, Hall uncovers surprising and important insights, including new revelations on how attack ads influence public engagement with judicial elections and their relative effectiveness in various types of state elections. Attacking Judges is a testament to the power of institutions in American politics and the value of empirical political science research in helping to inform some of the most significant debates on the public agenda. This book's results smartly contest and eradicate many of the fears judicial reformers have about the damaging effects of campaign negativity in modern state supreme court elections.

Contents:

Front matter

Contents

Tables and Figures

Preface and Acknowledgments

1. Attacking Judges

2. State Supreme Court Elections in Contemporary Democracy

3. Campaign Advertising in State Supreme Court Elections

4. Attack Advertising and Electoral Support for State Supreme Court Justices

5. Attack Advertising and Citizen Participation in State Supreme Court Elections

6. State Supreme Court Elections Are Different—by Design

Notes

References

Index

Notes:

Description based upon print version of record.

Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 23. Jul 2020)

ISBN:

9780804793094

0804793093

OCLC:

1178769420