1 option
Cato Supreme Court Review, 2006-2007.
- Format:
- Book
- Author/Creator:
- Moller, Mark.
- Language:
- English
- Subjects (All):
- Constitutional law--United States--Periodicals.
- Constitutional law--United States.
- United States. Supreme Court--Periodicals.
- United States. Supreme Court.
- Local Subjects:
- Constitutional law--United States--Periodicals.
- Constitutional law--United States.
- United States. Supreme Court--Periodicals.
- United States. Supreme Court.
- Physical Description:
- 1 online resource (386 p.)
- Place of Publication:
- Lanham : Cato Institute, 2007.
- Language Note:
- English
- Summary:
- Once again, the Cato Supreme Court Review will analyze the most notable cases from the most recent term.
- Contents:
- Contents; Foreword: The Roberts Court Emerges: Restrained or Active?; Introduction; Challenges to the Rule of Law: Or, Quod Licet Jovi Non Licet Bovi; Death by a Thousand Cuts: Constitutional Wrongs Without Remedies After Wilkie v. Robbins; First Amendment Basics Redux: Buckley v. Valeo to FEC v. Wisconsin Right to Life; When Easy Cases Make Bad Law:; BONG HiTS 4 JESUS: The First Amendment Takes a Hit; Gonzales v. Carhart: An Alternate Opinion; Litigating to Regulate: Massachusetts v.; Narrow Issue of Taxpayer Standing Highlights Wide Divisions Among the Justices
- The Non-Preferment Principle and the ''Racial Tiebreaker'' CasesProtecting Consumers From Consumer Protection: Watters v. Wachovia Bank; Weyerhaeuser and the Search for Antitrust's Holy Grail; Punitive Damages and the Supreme Court: A Tragedy in Five Acts; Looking Ahead: October Term 2007; Contributors; Untitled
- Notes:
- Description based upon print version of record.
- Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources.
- ISBN:
- 9786611905200
- 9781281905208
- 1281905208
- 9781933995601
- 1933995602
- OCLC:
- 649835782
The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.