My Account Log in

2 options

Future of the Internet : social networks, policy issues, and learning tools / Rick D. Sullivan and Dominick P. Bartell, editors.

EBSCOhost Academic eBook Collection (North America) Available online

View online

Ebook Central Academic Complete Available online

View online
Format:
Book
Contributor:
Sullivan, Rick D.
Bartell, Dominick P.
Series:
Internet Theory, Technology and Applications
Internet theory, technology and applications
Language:
English
Subjects (All):
Internet.
Online social networks.
Telecommunication policy.
Disclosure of information.
Physical Description:
1 online resource (228 p.)
Edition:
1st ed.
Place of Publication:
New York : Nova Science Publishers, c2011.
Language Note:
English
Summary:
This book examines the current aspects of the internet which affect society, as well as the projected effect the internet will have in the future. Topics discussed include using social networking sites to look at the future; personal information agency and reseller adherence to key privacy principles; laws regarding personal information, including social security numbers, being used by internet resellers; e-governance in the Pacific Islanders and the use of web 2.0 tools to support collaborative learning.
Contents:
Intro
FUTURE OF THE INTERNET: SOCIAL NETWORKS, POLICY ISSUES AND LEARNING TOOLS
CONTENTS
PREFACE
USING ONLINE SOCIAL NETWORKS TO LOOK AT THE FUTURE
AN OVERVIEW OF ONLINE SOCIAL NETWORKS (OSNS)
INTRODUCTION TO FORESIGHT
OSNS FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF FORESIGHT
OSNS TO PROVIDE EVIDENCE
OSNS TO BUILD EXPERTISE
OSNS TO ENCOURAGE CREATIVITY
OSNS TO FOSTER INTERACTION
OUTLOOK FOR THE FUTURE: METAVERSES AND SECOND LIFE
CONCLUSIONS
REFERENCES
PERSONAL INFORMATION AGENCY AND RESELLER ADHERENCE TO KEY PRIVACY PRINCIPLES
WHAT GAO FOUND
WHY GAO DID THIS STUDY
WHAT GAO RECOMMENDS
ABBREVIATIONS
RESULTS IN BRIEF
BACKGROUND
Federal Laws and Guidance Govern Use of Personal Information in Federal Agencies
Additional Laws Provide Privacy Protections for Specific Types and Uses of Information
The Fair Information Practices Are Widely Agreed to Be Key Principles for Privacy Protection
Congressional Interest in the Information Reseller Industry Has Been Heightened
USING GOVERNMENTWIDE CONTRACTS, FEDERAL AGENCIES OBTAIN
Personal Information from Information Resellers for a Variety of Purposes
Department of Justice Uses Information Resellers Primarily for Law Enforcement and Counterterrorism Purposes
DHS Uses Information Resellers Primarily for Law Enforcement and Counterterrorism
SSA Uses Information Resellers Primarily for Fraud Prevention and Identity Verification
The Department of State Uses Information Resellers Primarily for Passport Fraud Detection and Investigation
Agencies Contract with Information Resellers Primarily through Use of GSA's Federal Supply Schedules and the Library of Congress's FEDLINK Service.
RESELLERS TAKE STEPS TO PROTECT PRIVACY, BUT THESE MEASURES ARE NOT FULLY CONSISTENT WITH THE FAIR INFORMATION PRACTICES
Information Resellers Generally Did Not Report Limiting Their Data Collection to Specific Purposes or Notifying Individuals about Them
Information Resellers Do Not Ensure That Personal Information They Provide Is Accurate for Specific Purposes
Information Resellers' Specification of the Purpose of Data Collection Consists of Broad Descriptions of Business Categories
Information Resellers Generally Limit the Use of Information as Required by Law, Rather Than on the Basis of Purposes Originally Specified When the Information Was Collected
Information Resellers Reported Taking Steps to Improve Security Safeguards
Information Resellers Generally Informed the Public about Their Privacy Policies and Practices
Information Reseller Policies Generally Allow Individuals Limited Ability to Access and Correct Their Personal Information
Information Resellers Report Measures to Ensure Accountability for the Collection and Use of Personal Information
AGENCIES LACK POLICIES ON USE OF RESELLER DATA, AND PRACTICES DO NOT CONSISTENTLY REFLECT THE FAIR INFORMATION PRACTICES
Agency Procedures Reflect the Collection Limitation, Data Quality, Use Limitation, and Security Safeguards Principles
Limitations in the Applicability of the Privacy Act and Ambiguities in OMB Guidance Contribute to an Uneven Adherence to the Purpose Specification, Openness, and Individual Participation Principles
Privacy Impact Assessments Could Address Openness, and Purpose Specification Principles but Are Often Not Conducted
Agencies Often Did Not Have Practices in Place to Ensure Accountability for Proper Handling of Information Reseller Data
MATTER FOR CONGRESSIONAL CONSIDERATION.
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR EXECUTIVE ACTION
AGENCY COMMENTS AND OUR EVALUATION
COMMENTS FROM INFORMATION RESELLERS
LIST OF REQUESTERS
APPENDIX I
Objectives, Scope, and Methodology
APPENDIX II
Federal Laws Affecting Information Resellers
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act
Driver's Privacy Protection Act
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act
Fair Credit Reporting Act
Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act
APPENDIX III
Comments from the Department of Justice
APPENDIX IV
Comments from the Department of Homeland Security
APPENDIX V
Comments from the Social Security Administration
APPENDIX VI
Comments from the Department of State
PERSONAL INFORMATION: KEY FEDERAL PRIVACY LAWS DO NOT REQUIRE INFORMATION RESELLERS TO SAFEGUARD ALL SENSITIVE DATA
FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS USE INFORMATION RESELLERS FOR ELIGIBILITY DETERMINATIONS, FRAUD PREVENTION, PATRIOT ACT COMPLIANCE, AND MARKETING
Consumer Reports Sold by Credit Bureaus and Other CRAs Are Used to Make Credit and Insurance Eligibility Decisions
Financial Institutions Use Information Resellers to Comply with the PATRIOT Act, Prevent Fraud, Mitigate Risk, and Locate Individuals
Complying with PATRIOT Act Requirements
Preventing and Detecting Fraud
Reducing Risk and Locating Individuals
Some Financial Institutions Use Information Resellers for Marketing
FEDERAL PRIVACY AND INFORMATION SECURITY LAWS APPLY TO MANY INFORMATION RESELLER PRODUCTS, DEPENDING ON THEIR USE AND SOURCE
Several Federal Privacy and Security Laws Apply to Personal Data Held by Information Resellers
FCRA Applies Only to Consumer Information Used to Determine Eligibility.
FCRA Provides Access, Correction, and Opt-Out Rights for Consumer Reports
GLBA Applies to Information Resellers That Are Financial Institutions or Receive Information from Financial Institutions
GLBA Privacy Provisions
GLBA Safeguarding Provisions
No Federal Statute Requires Notification of Data Breaches
FTC HAS PRIMARY RESPONSIBILITY FOR ENFORCING INFORMATION RESELLERS' COMPLIANCE WITH PRIVACY AND INFORMATION SECURITY LAWS
FTC Has Primary Federal Enforcement Authority over Information Resellers
FTC Has Investigated and Initiated Formal Enforcement Actions against Information Resellers for FCRA and FTC Act Violations
FTC Cannot Levy Civil Penalties for GLBA Information Privacy and Security Violations
AGENCIES DIFFER IN THEIR OVERSIGHT OF THE PRIVACY AND SECURITY OF PERSONAL INFORMATION AT FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS
Financial Institutions and Their Regulators Said They Do Not Distinguish between Data from Information Resellers and Other Sources
Federal Banking Agencies Provide Guidance and Examine Regulated Banking Organizations for GLBA and FCRA Compliance
Regulations and Other Guidance
Examinations and Enforcement Actions
Securities Regulators Oversee GLBA Compliance of Securities Firms
NASD and NYSE Regulation Oversee Compliance of Member Broker-Dealers
State Insurance Regulators Require Insurers to Comply with Information Privacy and Security Provisions, but Enforcement May Be Limited
NAIC Has Developed Model GLBA Privacy and Safeguarding Rules, but Not All States Have Adopted GLBA Regulations
Individual State Insurance Regulators Have Not Consistently Examined for Privacy and Security Compliance
FTC Enforces GLBA and FCRA Compliance of Financial Institutions within Its Jurisdiction.
NCUA, Securities, and Insurance Regulators Do Not Have Full Authority to Examine Third-Party Vendors, Including Information Resellers
MATTERS FOR CONGRESSIONAL CONSIDERATION
RECOMMENDATION FOR EXECUTIVE ACTION
AGENCY COMMENTS
APPENDIX I: SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY
APPENDIX II: SAMPLE INFORMATION RESELLER REPORTS
Sample Insurance Claims History Report
Sample Deposit Account History Report
Sample Identity Verification and OFAC Screening Report
Sample Fraud Investigation Report
APPENDIX III: COMMENTS FROM THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERS: INTERNET RESELLERS PROVIDE FEW FULL SSNS, BUT CONGRESS SHOULD CONSIDER ENACTING STANDARDS FOR TRUNCATING SSNS
INTERNET RESELLERS' WEB SITES SHARED SIMILAR CHARACTERISTICS
Internet Resellers Offered to Sell a Variety of Information in Various Ways
Internet Resellers Usually Identified Their Clients
Three-Quarters of Internet Resellers Identified Their Sources of Information
MOST ATTEMPTS TO PURCHASE SSNS FAILED
APPLICABILITY OF FEDERAL PRIVACY LAWS TO INTERNET RESELLERS CANNOT BE DETERMINED
MATTER FOR CONGRESSIONAL CONSIDERATION
APPENDIX II: COMMENTS FROM THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
E-GOVERNANCE IN THE PACIFIC ISLANDS: ENTRENCHING GOOD GOVERNANCE AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT BY PROMOTING ICT STRATEGIES BASED ON THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION
1. INTRODUCTION
2. WHAT IS THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION?
3. THE VALUE OF THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION
3.1. Promoting Democratic Governance
3.2. Supporting Participatory Development and Effective Service Delivery.
3.3. Supports State-building and Promotes National Stability.
Notes:
Description based upon print version of record.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
Description based on print version record.
ISBN:
1-61942-428-2
OCLC:
923652944

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

Find

Home Release notes

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Find catalog Using Articles+ Using your account