3 options
Covert modality in non-infinite contexts / by Rajesh Bhatt.
- Format:
- Book
- Thesis/Dissertation
- Author/Creator:
- Bhatt, Rajesh, 1973-
- Series:
- Interface explorations ; 8.
- Interface explorations ; 8
- Language:
- English
- Subjects (All):
- Modality (Linguistics).
- Grammar, Comparative and general--Relative clauses.
- Grammar, Comparative and general.
- Physical Description:
- 1 online resource (216 p.)
- Edition:
- 1st ed.
- Place of Publication:
- Berlin ; New York : Mouton de Gruyter, 2006.
- Language Note:
- English
- Summary:
- This book investigates the distribution and interpretation of Covert Modality. Covert Modality is modality which we interpret but which is not associated with any lexical item in the structure that we are interpreting. This dissertation investigates a class of environments that involves covert modality. Examples of covert modality include wh-infinitival complements, infinitival relative clauses, purpose clauses, the 'have to' construction, and the 'is to' construction (cf. 1): 1a. Tim knows [how to solve the problem]. ("Tim knows how one/he could/should solve the problem.")1b. Jane found [a book to draw cartoons in] for Sara. ("Jane found a book for Sara one could/should draw cartoons in.")1c. [The man to fix the sink] is here. ("The man whose purpose is to fix the sink is here.")1d. Sue went to Torino [to buy a violin]. ("Sue went to Torino so that she could buy a violin.") 1e. Bill has to reach Philadelphia before noon. ("Bill must reach Philadelphia before noon.")1f. Will is to leave tomorrow. ("Will is scheduled/supposed to leave tomorrow.") The interpretation of (1a-f) involves modality; however, there is no lexical item that seems to be the source of the modality. What (1a-f) have in common is that they involve infinitivals. This book addresses the following questions about covert modality: what is the source of this modality, what are its semantic properties, why are some but not all infinitival relatives modal, and why are all infinitival questions modal? The infinitival [+wh] Complementizer is identified as the source of the covert modality. The apparent variability of the force of this modality is related to the particular semantics of this Complementizer. Infinitival relatives that receive a non-modal interpretation are analyzed as being reduced relatives and thus not involving the infinitival [+wh] Complementizer.
- Contents:
- Front matter
- Contents
- Chapter 1. Introduction
- Chapter 2. The syntax of infinitival relatives
- Chapter 3. Non-Modal subject infinitival relatives
- Chapter 4. Infinitival questions
- Chapter 5. Ability modals and their actuality entailments
- Back matter
- Notes:
- Description based upon print version of record.
- Dissertation University of Pennsylvania 1999.
- Includes bibliographical references and index.
- ISBN:
- 9786612193873
- 9781282193871
- 1282193872
- 9783110197341
- 3110197340
- OCLC:
- 437195769
The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.