My Account Log in

4 options

The cloaking of power : Montesquieu, Blackstone, and the rise of judicial activism / Paul O. Carrese.

De Gruyter University of Chicago Press eBook-Package Backlist 2000-2013 Available online

View online

EBSCOhost Academic eBook Collection (North America) Available online

View online

Ebook Central Academic Complete Available online

View online

Ebscohost Ebooks University Press Collection (North America) Available online

View online
Format:
Book
Author/Creator:
Carrese, Paul.
Language:
English
Subjects (All):
Montesquieu, Charles de Secondat, baron de, 1689-1755.
Montesquieu, Charles de Secondat.
Blackstone, William, 1723-1780.
Blackstone, William.
Judicial process--Political aspects--History.
Judicial process.
Political questions and judicial power--History.
Political questions and judicial power.
Judicial power--History.
Judicial power.
Liberalism--History.
Liberalism.
Jurisprudence--History.
Jurisprudence.
Physical Description:
1 online resource (351 p.)
Edition:
1st ed.
Place of Publication:
Chicago : University of Chicago Press, 2003.
Language Note:
English
Summary:
How did the US judiciary become so powerful-powerful enough that state and federal judges once vied to decide a presidential election? What does this prominence mean for the law, constitutionalism, and liberal democracy? In The Cloaking of Power, Paul O. Carrese provides a provocative analysis of the intellectual sources of today's powerful judiciary, arguing that Montesquieu, in his Spirit of the Laws, first articulated a new conception of the separation of powers and strong but subtle courts. Montesquieu instructed statesmen to "cloak power" by placing judges at the center of politics, while concealing them behind juries and subtle reforms. Tracing this conception through Blackstone, Hamilton, and Tocqueville, Carrese shows how it led to the prominence of judges, courts, and lawyers in America today. But he places the blame for contemporary judicial activism squarely at the feet of Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. and his jurisprudential revolution, which he believes to be the source of the now-prevalent view that judging is merely political. To address this crisis, Carrese argues for a rediscovery of an independent judiciary-one that blends prudence and natural law with common law and that observes the moderate jurisprudence of Montesquieu and Blackstone, balancing abstract principles with realistic views of human nature and institutions. He also advocates for a return to the complex constitutionalism of the American founders and Tocqueville and for judges who understand their responsibility to elevate citizens above individualism, instructing them in law and right.
Contents:
Frontmatter
Contents
Acknowledgments
Note on Texts
Introduction. The Subtle Judge and Moderate Liberalism
PART ONE. Montesquieu's Jurisprudence and New Judicial Power
PART TWO. Blackstone and the Montesquieuan Constitution
PART THREE. Montesquieu's Judicial Legacy in America
Conclusion. The Cloaking of Power and the Perpetuation of Constitutionalism
Notes
Bibliography
Index
Notes:
Description based upon print version of record.
Includes bibliographical references (p. 295-313) and index.
ISBN:
9786612537295
9781282537293
1282537296
9780226094830
0226094839
OCLC:
593356157

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

Find

Home Release notes

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Find catalog Using Articles+ Using your account