My Account Log in

3 options

Fairness versus welfare / Louis Kaplow, Steven Shavell.

De Gruyter Harvard University Press eBook Package Backlist 2000-2013 Available online

View online

EBSCOhost Academic eBook Collection (North America) Available online

View online

Ebook Central Academic Complete Available online

View online
Format:
Book
Author/Creator:
Kaplow, Louis.
Contributor:
Shavell, Steven, 1946-
Language:
English
Subjects (All):
Ethics.
Fairness.
Justice.
Law and economics.
Social policy.
Physical Description:
1 online resource (xxii, 544 p.)
Edition:
1st ed.
Place of Publication:
Cambridge, Mass. ; London : Harvard University Press, 2006.
Language Note:
English
Summary:
By what criteria should public policy be evaluated? This study poses a bold challenge to contemporary moral philosophy by showing that most moral principles conflict more sharply with welfare than is generally recognised.
By what criteria should public policy be evaluated? Fairness and justice? Or the welfare of individuals? Debate over this fundamental question has spanned the ages. Fairness versus Welfare poses a bold challenge to contemporary moral philosophy by showing that most moral principles conflict more sharply with welfare than is generally recognized. In particular, the authors demonstrate that all principles that are not based exclusively on welfare will sometimes favor policies under which literally everyone would be worse off. The book draws on the work of moral philosophers, economists, evolutionary and cognitive psychologists, and legal academics to scrutinize a number of particular subjects that have engaged legal scholars and moral philosophers. How can the deeply problematic nature of all nonwelfarist principles be reconciled with our moral instincts and intuitions that support them? The authors offer a fascinating explanation of the origins of our moral instincts and intuitions, developing ideas originally advanced by Hume and Sidgwick and more recently explored by psychologists and evolutionary theorists. Their analysis indicates that most moral principles that seem appealing, upon examination, have a functional explanation, one that does not justify their being accorded independent weight in the assessment of public policy. Fairness versus Welfare has profound implications for the theory and practice of policy analysis and has already generated considerable debate in academia.
Contents:
Frontmatter
SUMMARY OF CONTENTS
CONTENTS
Prologue
Acknowledgments
PART ONE. FRAMEWORK
I. Introduction
II. Welfare Economics and Notions of Fairness
PART TWO. ANALYSIS
III. Torts
IV. Contracts
V. Legal Procedure
VI. Law Enforcement
PART THREE. EXTENSIONS
VII. On the Use of Notions of Fairness and Welfare Economics by Different Types of Actors
VIII. Comments on the Breadth and Soundness of Welfare Economics
IX. Conclusion
References
Index
Notes:
Originally published: 2002.
ISBN:
9780674039315
0674039319
OCLC:
923111433

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Library Catalog Using Articles+ Library Account