My Account Log in

4 options

Achieving peace or protecting human rights? : conflicts between norms regarding ethnic discrimination in the Dayton Peace Agreement / by Gro Nystuen.

EBSCOhost Academic eBook Collection (North America) Available online

View online

EBSCOhost Ebook Public Library Collection - North America Available online

View online

Ebook Central Academic Complete Available online

View online

Human Rights and Humanitarian Law - Book Archive 2000-2005 Available online

View online
Format:
Book
Author/Creator:
Nystuen, Gro.
Series:
Raoul Wallenberg Institute human rights library ; v. 23.
Raoul Wallenberg Institute human rights library ; v. 23
Language:
English
Subjects (All):
Yugoslav War, 1991-1995--Peace.
Yugoslav War, 1991-1995.
Discrimination--Law and legislation--Former Yugoslav republics.
Discrimination.
Human rights--Former Yugoslav republics.
Human rights.
Dayton Peace Accords (1995).
Dayton Peace Accords.
Physical Description:
1 online resource (310 p.)
Edition:
1st ed.
Place of Publication:
Leiden ; Boston : Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2005.
Language Note:
English
Summary:
"Achieving peace or protecting human rights? Conflicts between norms regarding ethnic discrimination in the Dayton Peace Agreement" examines some of the legal issues pertaining to international settlements aiming at ending a war, finding political common ground between bitter enemies, and at the same time, protecting individual human rights. The author examines the Dayton Peace Agreement for Bosnia and Herzegovina, and in particular the constitutional framework which on the one hand secures everyone's human rights and protection from ethnic discrimination, but on the other hand sets up a political system which in fact discriminates on the basis of ethnicity. The author argues that it might have been consistent with international law (particularly the legal regimes of derogation and necessity) to agree on such a constitutional system at the time of the Dayton negotiations because the alternative was a high risk of continued war, but that a constitutional arrangement with clear human rights deficiencies should have been made temporary. The author points out that the ethnically-based constitutional system, for the time being, seems to prevail at the expense of the right to non-discrimination, and discusses various possibilities of altering this situation.
Contents:
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION
CHAPTER 2. METHODOLOGY
CHAPTER 3. THE DAYTON PEACE AGREEMENT - BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW
CHAPTER 4. THE GENERAL FRAMEWORK AGREEMENT FOR PEACE IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA
CHAPTER 5. PROTECTION AGAINST ETHNIC DISCRIMINATION IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA
CHAPTER 6. ETHNIC DIFFERENTIATION RULES IN THE BH CONSTITUTION
CHAPTER 7. THE SCOPE OF CONFLICT BETWEEN THE NON-DISCRIMINATION RULES AND THE
RULES AUTHORISING ETHNIC DIFFERENTIATION
CHAPTER 8. POSSIBLE JUSTIFICATIONS FOR ETHNIC DIFFERENTIATION IN EMERGENCIES
CHAPTER 9. POSSIBLE WAYS OF ADDRESSING ETHNIC DIFFERENTIATION
CHAPTER 10.; CONCLUDING REMARKS
BIBLIOGRAPHY
TABLE OF CASES
ANNEX I
ANNEX II
INDEX.
Notes:
Description based on print version record.
Originally presented as the author's thesis (doctoral)--University of Oslo, 2004.
Includes bibliographical references (p. 255-261) and index.
ISBN:
1-280-86867-8
9786610868674
1-4294-2717-5
90-474-0829-2
1-4337-0455-2
OCLC:
476023558
Publisher Number:
10.1163/9789047408291 DOI

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

Find

Home Release notes

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Find catalog Using Articles+ Using your account