My Account Log in

3 options

Assessment of the results of external independent reviews for U.S. Department of Energy projects / Committee on Assessing the Results of External Independent Reviews for U.S. Department of Energy Projects, Board on Infrastructure and the Constructed Environment, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, National Research Council of the National Academies.

EBSCOhost Academic eBook Collection (North America) Available online

View online

Ebook Central Academic Complete Available online

View online

National Academies Press Available online

View online
Format:
Book
Author/Creator:
National Research Council (U.S.). Committee on Assessing the Results of External Independent Reviews for U.S. Department of Energy Projects.
Language:
English
Subjects (All):
United States. Department of Energy.
United States.
Energy policy--United States--Planning--Evaluation.
Energy policy.
Physical Description:
1 online resource (73 p.)
Edition:
1st ed.
Place of Publication:
Washington, DC : National Academies Press, c2007.
Language Note:
English
Summary:
Peer review is an essential component of engineering practice and other scientific and technical undertakings. Peer reviews are conducted to ensure that activities are technically adequate, competently performed, and properly documented; to validate assumptions, calculations, and extrapolations; and to assess alternative interpretations, methodologies, acceptance criteria, and other aspects of the work products and the documentation that support them. Effective peer reviews are conducted in an environment of mutual respect, recognizing the contributions of all participants. Their primary objective is to help the project team achieve its goals. Reviews also contribute to quality assurance, risk management, and overall improvement of the management process. The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) conducts different types of peer reviews at the different stages of a project, including reviews to assess risks and other factors related to design, safety, cost estimates, value engineering, and project management. Independent project reviews (IPRs) are conducted by federal staff not directly affiliated with the project or program and management and operations (M&O) contractors. External independent reviews (EIRs) are overseen by the Office of Engineering and Construction Management and conducted by contractors external to the department. EIRs are the primary focus of this report. However, the committee found that, in many cases, IPRs are explicitly used as preparation for or as preliminary reviews prior to EIRs. Thus, because IPRs are integral to the review process in DOE, they are also discussed because they might have an effect on EIRs. In October 2000, DOE issued Order 413.3, Program and Project Management for the Acquisition of Capital Assets (DOE, 2000). The order established a series of five critical decisions (CDs), or major milestones, that require senior management review and approval to ensure that a project satisfies applicable mission, design, security, and safety requirements: approve mission need, approve alternative selection and cost range, approve performance baseline, approve start of construction, and approve start of operations or project closeout. Assessment of the Results of External Independent Reviews for U. S. Department of Energy Projects summarizes the results.
Contents:
""Front matter ""; ""Acknowledgment of Reviewers""; ""Contents""; ""Summary""; ""1 Introduction""; ""2 Characteristics of Effective External Independent Reviews""; ""3 Criteria for Structuring Review Programs""; ""4 Conclusions, Findings, and Recommendations""; ""A Biographies of Committee Members and Consultant""; ""B EIR Documents Reviewed by the Committee""; ""C Summary Notes of a Workshop on DOE EIRs""; ""D Acronyms and Abbreviations""
Notes:
Description based upon print version of record.
Includes bibliographical references.
ISBN:
0-309-17981-5
1-280-84431-0
9786610844319
0-309-10640-0
OCLC:
229185586

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

Find

Home Release notes

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Find catalog Using Articles+ Using your account