2 options
Performance management and evaluation / Steffen Bohni Nielsen, David E.K. Hunter, editors.
- Format:
- Book
- Series:
- New directions for evaluation ; no. 137 (Spring 2013)
- New directions for evaluation, 1097-6736 ; no. 137 (Spring 2013)
- Language:
- English
- Subjects (All):
- Employees--Rating of.
- Employees.
- Physical Description:
- 130 p. : ill.
- Edition:
- 1st ed.
- Place of Publication:
- San Francisco : Jossey-Bass, 2013.
- Language Note:
- English
- Summary:
- This issue focuses on connections between performance management and evaluation, a contentious topic at the moment. It does so by placing evaluation and monitoring under the overarching concept of performance management, and then by investigating five complementarities between performance monitoring and measurement on the one hand, and evaluation on the other. These complementarities are: Sequential Informational Organizational Methodical Hierarchical. Several case studies discuss the uses and complementarities of evaluation and performance management in contexts including national and local governments and the work of government, philanthropic foundations, and a direct-service nonprofit agency. These cases illustrate the advantages and pitfalls in utilizing evaluative approaches within the context of performance management. This is the 137th volume of the Jossey-Bass quarterly report series New Directions for Evaluation, an official publication of the American Evaluation Association.
- Contents:
- Intro
- Performance Management and Evaluation
- Copyright
- Contents
- Statement of the Editor-In-Chief
- Editors' Notes
- Contributions to This Issue
- References
- 1. Performance Management and Evaluation: Exploring Complementarities
- Addressing Two Critiques of Performance Management as a Means of Knowledge Production
- Measurement
- Attribution
- What Is Performance Management?
- Performance Leadership
- Management Structure
- Information and Knowledge Production
- 2. Sorting the Relationships Among Performance Measurement, Program Evaluation, and Performance Management
- An Abbreviated History of Program Evaluation and Performance Measurement in the United States
- Program Evaluation
- Performance Measurement
- The Relationship Between Program Evaluation and Performance Measurement
- Advantages and Disadvantages of Each Process
- Identifying Attribution
- Coverage of Agency Programs
- Depth of Information Provided
- Link to Program Costs
- Timeliness of Information
- Measurement Cost and Resource Requirements
- Data Quality
- Feasibility for Small Organizations
- Complementary Elements Between Program Evaluation and Performance Measurement
- Desirable Improvements
- Desirable Performance-Measurement System Improvements
- Desirable Program-Evaluation Improvements
- Future Directions: (1) Using Data to Examine Future Options and (2) Considering Program Costs as Well as Effectiveness
- Some Reflections on the Interrelationship Between Performance Management, Measurement, and Program Evaluation
- 3. Transforming Silo-Steering Into a Performance Governance System: The Case of the Finnish Central Government
- Emergence and Structure of the Finnish Performance-Management System
- Reforms
- Design
- Performance Evaluation
- Toward Evidence-Based Performance Governance.
- Conclusion
- 4. Rethinking the Relationship Among Monitoring, Evaluation, and Results-Based Management: Observations From Canada
- Evolution of Monitoring and Evaluation in Canada
- Organization and Institutional Arrangements for M&
- E in the Canadian System
- Internal Evaluation Units in Most Federal Departments, With Central Leadership
- An Emphasis on Both Monitoring and Evaluation
- A Well-Defined Foundation Setting the Rules and Expectations for Performance Measurement and Evaluation
- Formal Requirements for Using M&
- E Information in Government
- Roles and Responsibilities of the Key Actors
- Centre of Excellence for Evaluation (CEE): The Government's Evaluation Policy Centre
- TBS Policy Centre for Performance Monitoring and Reporting
- Organization of M&
- E in Government Departments
- The National Audit Office in the M&
- E System
- Finding the Right Balance Between the Learning and Accountability
- Complementarity Between Monitoring and Evaluation-Moving From Theory to Reality
- How Has E Supported M?
- How Does M Support E?
- Rethinking the Relationship Among M, E, and RBM
- A More Balanced Approach Between Learning and Accountability Aspects Is Needed
- M&
- E Systems Need to Be Balanced Without an Overreliance on One Form of Knowledge Production
- Organizations Need a Knowledge Strategy to Ensure Strategic Needs Are Met
- Limits to Complementarity?
- 5. Performance Management and Evaluation in the Danish Public Employment Service
- The Danish Public Employment System
- The Governance of the Public Employment System
- Access to Data: Building a Common Data Platform and Monitoring System
- Dialogue With Stakeholders Based on Data
- The Use of Evaluations to Create Evidence
- Achieving Complementarities-Challenges and Solutions
- Informational Complementarity.
- Sequential Complementarity
- Organizational Complementarity
- Methodical Complementarity
- Hierarchical Complementarity
- Conclusion: Lessons for Complementarity?
- 6. The Emergence of Performance Measurement as a Complement to Evaluation Among U.S. Foundations
- Performance Measurement Gains Ground
- Promising Approaches and Limitations
- Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
- World Bank Group
- Strategies for Going Forward
- Concluding Themes
- Performance Measurement and Evaluation-Both Are Necessary, but There Are Important Trade-Offs
- All Grantees Should Be Expected to Engage in Some Level of Measurement, but Not All Grantees Need to Undertake Formal Evaluations
- Foundations' Expectations About Evaluation, Measurement, and Use of Information, With Few Exceptions, Rarely Align With the Level of Support Provided to Grantees for These Activities
- 7. Citizen-Driven Performance Measurement: Opportunities for Evaluator Collaboration in Support of the New Governance
- Citizen-Driven Performance Measurement
- Emergence of Performance Measurement
- Toward Citizen Engagement
- Community Indicators Movement
- Current Use
- Integrating Community Indicators and Programmatic Performance Measures
- Evaluator Contributions to Performance Measurement
- Participatory Evaluation
- Program Theory
- System Theory
- Final Reflections
- 8. Performance Management and Evaluation in Norwegian Local Government: Complementary or Competing Tools of Management?
- Complementarities and Alternatives to Evaluation
- Performance Management and Evaluation in Norwegian Local Government
- Implementation
- Use
- Assessment
- Some Final Reflections on Competition and Complementarity
- References.
- 9. Managing for Results in the U.S. Not-for-Profit Sector: Applying Complementary Approaches of Knowledge Production at the Center for Employment Opportunities
- In an Era of Scarcity
- Scope of the Chapter
- Evaluation and Performance Measurement and Monitoring
- About the Center of Employment Opportunities
- The Evolution of Performance Management in CEO
- Converging Evaluation and Monitoring When Managing for Results
- 10. Challenges to and Forms of Complementarity Between Performance Management and Evaluation
- Contexts for Performance Management
- Challenges to Performance Management
- Types of Complementarity
- Evaluators at a Crossroads
- Index.
- Notes:
- Bibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph
- Includes bibliographical references and index.
- ISBN:
- 1-118-64632-0
- 1-299-38524-9
- 1-118-64651-7
- OCLC:
- 831116914
The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.