3 options
Equivalence and duality for module categories : with tilting and cotilting for rings / Robert R. Colby, Kent R. Fuller.
- Format:
- Book
- Author/Creator:
- Colby, Robert R. (Robert Ray), 1938- author.
- Fuller, Kent R., author.
- Series:
- Cambridge tracts in mathematics ; 161.
- Cambridge tracts in mathematics ; 161
- Language:
- English
- Subjects (All):
- Rings (Algebra).
- Modules (Algebra).
- Duality theory (Mathematics).
- Physical Description:
- 1 online resource (ix, 152 pages) : digital, PDF file(s).
- Edition:
- 1st ed.
- Other Title:
- Equivalence & Duality for Module Categories with Tilting & Cotilting for Rings
- Place of Publication:
- Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2004.
- Language Note:
- English
- Summary:
- This book provides a unified approach to much of the theories of equivalence and duality between categories of modules that has transpired over the last 45 years. In particular, during the past dozen or so years many authors (including the authors of this book) have investigated relationships between categories of modules over a pair of rings that are induced by both covariant and contravariant representable functors, in particular by tilting and cotilting theories. By here collecting and unifying the basic results of these investigations with innovative and easily understandable proofs, the authors' aim is to provide an aid to further research in this central topic in abstract algebra, and a reference for all whose research lies in this field.
- Contents:
- Some module theoretic observations
- Representable equivalences
- Tilting modules
- Representable dualities
- Cotilting
- Adjoints and category equivalence
- Noetherian serial rings.
- Notes:
- Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015).
- Includes bibliographical references (p. 147-150) and index.
- ISBN:
- 1-107-15057-4
- 1-280-45833-X
- 9786610458332
- 0-511-18614-2
- 0-511-18531-6
- 0-511-18800-5
- 0-511-31394-2
- 0-511-54651-3
- 0-511-18707-6
- OCLC:
- 171138605
The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.