My Account Log in

2 options

Taking ownership of accreditation : assessment processes that promote institutional improvement and faculty engagement / edited by Amy Driscoll and Diane Cordero de Noriega ; preface by Judith A. Ramaley.

Ebook Central Academic Complete Available online

View online

Ebook Central College Complete Available online

View online
Format:
Book
Contributor:
Driscoll, Amy, editor.
Noriega, Diane Cordero de, 1943- editor.
Ramaley, Judith A., writer of preface.
Language:
English
Subjects (All):
Accreditation (Education)--United States.
Accreditation (Education).
Universities and colleges--United States--Evaluation.
Universities and colleges.
California State University--Accreditation.
California State University.
Physical Description:
1 online resource (271 pages)
Edition:
1st ed.
Place of Publication:
Sterling, Virginia : Stylus, 2006.
Summary:
This book demonstrates how a participatory approach to assessment and accreditation in their new forms creates a synergy for learner-centered education. It is a guide to approaching the accreditation process from a campus-wide perspective of ownership--illustrated by rich descriptions.
Contents:
Cover
Half Title
Title
Copyright
Dedication
Contents
PREFACE: USING ACCREDITATION TO IMPROVE PRACTICE
1 ASSESSMENT AND ACCREDITATION: PRODUCTIVE PARTNERSHIPS
Setting the Stage
Assessment of the Past
Assessment Today
Accreditation of the Past
Evidence of the Accreditation Shift
Assessment and Accreditation: Partners for Improvement
The Future of Accreditation and Assessment
2 CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY MONTEREY BAY AND THE WESTERN ASSOCIATION OF SCHOOLS AND COLLEGES: UNDERSTANDING THEIR CULTURES OF INNOVATION
Descriptions from Two Perspectives
Western Association of Schools and Colleges: Innovative Accreditation Thinking
California State University Monterey Bay: Innovative Accreditation Thinking
3 INSTITUTIONAL VISION, VALUES, AND MISSION: FOUNDATIONAL FILTERS FOR INQUIRY
A Trio of Guides for Campus Practices and Assessment
A Trifocal Lens: Filtering Our Intentions and Inquiry
Bringing It All into Focus
4 PREPARING FOR ACCREDITATION: SOWING THE SEEDS OF LONG-TERM CHANGE
Directions for Preparation
Preparing the Soil: Communicating and Working with Campus Constituencies
Weeding and Pruning: Selecting the Best Evidence to Grow
Harvesting and Arranging: Presenting the Evidence
Moving On to Other Pastures?
5 PROGRAM REVIEW AS A MODEL OF VISION-BASED CONTINUOUS RENEWAL
Overview: CSUMB's Academic Program Review Process
Revision of the Initial Committee Mandate
Additional Processes: Facilitating Campuswide Discussion
Reflections on This Process Through a Best Practices Lens
6 MULTILAYERED INQUIRY FOR PROGRAM REVIEWS: METHODS AND ANALYSIS FOR CAMPUSWIDE IMPLICATIONS
Rationale for Inquiry
Implementing a Multilayered Inquiry: Planning and Design
Implementing a Multilayered Inquiry: Collecting the Data.
Implementing a Multilayered Inquiry: Analyzing Data
Implementing a Multilayered Inquiry: Writing the Report
Implementing a Multilayered Inquiry: Dissemination
Implementing a Multilayered Inquiry: Closing the Loop
Adapting the Writing Program Inquiry Process for Your Campus
7 EXAMINING CAPSTONE PRACTICES: A MODEL OF ASSETS-BASED SELF-STUDY
The Self-Study Model
Implementing the Self-Study
Brief Summary of Self-Study Results
The CSUMB Capstone Self-Study and Accreditation
Emerging Institutional Improvement
8 A STUDY OF "BEST PRACTICES" IN ASSESSMENT: A VISIBLE AND PUBLIC LEARINNG PROCESS
The Research Processes
Evidence of Best Practices in Campus Assessment Profile
Assessment Guideline 1: Define and Clarify Program Goals and Outcomes for Long-Term Improvement
Assessment Guideline 2: Make Assessment-for-Improvement a Team Effort
Assessment Guideline 3: Embed Assessment into Campus Conversations about Learning
Assessment Guideline 4: Use Assessment to Support Diverse Learning Abilities and to Understand Conditions Under Which Students Learn Best
Assessment Guideline 5: Connect Assessment Processes to Questions or Concerns That Program Decision Makers or Internal Stakeholders Really Care About
Assessment Guideline 6: Make Assessment Protocols and Results Meaningful and Available to Internal and External Stakeholders for Feedback and Ultimately Improvement
Assessment Guideline 7: Design an Assessment Model That Aligns With the Institutional Capacity to Support It
9 ONE DEPARTMENT'S ASSESSMENT STORY: PROCESSES AND LESSONS
The Collaborative Health and Human Services Program: Background and History
The Path to Skillful Assessment Practice
The CHHS Assessment Protocol
Lessons Learned
10 FACULTY INTERVIEWS: A STRATEGY FOR DEEPENING ENGAGEMENT IN INQUIRY.
Rationale and Chapter Organization
Campus and Researcher Context
First Interview Study
Findings: First Interview Study
Second Interview Study
Findings: Second Interview Study
The Value of Interview Studies
11 ADMINISTRATIVE ALIGNMENT AND ACCOUNTABILITY: STUDENT LEARNING AS FOCUS
Early Alignment Attempts
Alignment and Accountability
Planning Alignment and Integration: Thinking Alignment Across Plans
Costing the Model: Thinking Alignment and Student Learning
Strategic Plan Review and Renewal: Bringing Assessment, Alignment, and Accountability Together
12 POSTSCRIPT AND REFLECTIONS
INDEX.
Notes:
Description based on print version record.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN:
9781620360446
1620360446
OCLC:
945135954

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

Find

Home Release notes

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Find catalog Using Articles+ Using your account