5 options
Review of EPA's Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) process / Committee to Review the IRIS Process, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Division on Earth and Life Studies, National Research Council of the National Academies.
- Format:
- Book
- Author/Creator:
- National Research Council (U.S.). Division on Earth and Life Studies. Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology. Committee to Review the IRIS Process, originator.
- National Research Council (U.S.). Committee to Review the IRIS Process, author.
- Language:
- English
- Subjects (All):
- United States. Environmental Protection Agency.
- United States.
- Health risk assessment--United States--Databases.
- Health risk assessment.
- Hazardous wastes--Environmental aspects--United States--Data processing.
- Hazardous wastes.
- Environmental health--United States--Data processing.
- Environmental health.
- Physical Description:
- 1 online resource (171 p.)
- Edition:
- 1st ed.
- Place of Publication:
- Washington, District of Columbia : The National Academies Press, 2014.
- Language Note:
- English
- Summary:
- The Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) is a program within the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) that is responsible for developing toxicologic assessments of environmental contaminants. An IRIS assessment contains hazard identifications and dose-response assessments of various chemicals related to cancer and noncancer outcomes. Although the program was created to increase consistency among toxicologic assessments within the agency, federal, state, and international agencies and other organizations have come to rely on IRIS assessments for setting regulatory standards, establishing exposure guidelines, and estimating risks to exposed populations. Over the last decade, the National Research Council (NRC) has been asked to review some of the more complex and challenging IRIS assessments, including those of formaldehyde, dioxin, and tetrachloroethylene. In 2011, an NRC committee released its review of the IRIS formaldehyde assessment. Like other NRC committees that had reviewed IRIS assessments, the formaldehyde committee identified deficiencies in the specific assessment and more broadly in some of EPA's general approaches and specific methods. Although the committee focused on evaluating the IRIS formaldehyde assessment, it provided suggestions for improving the IRIS process and a roadmap for its revision in case EPA decided to move forward with changes to the process. Congress directed EPA to implement the report's recommendations and then asked the National Research Council to review the changes that EPA was making (or proposing to make) in response to the recommendations. Review of EPA's Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) Process provides an overview of some general issues associated with IRIS assessments. This report then addresses evidence identification and evaluation for IRIS assessments and discusses evidence integration for hazard evaluation and methods for calculating reference values and unit risks. The report makes recommendations and considerations for future directions. Overall, Review of EPA's Integrated Risk Information System Process finds that substantial improvements in the IRIS process have been made, and it is clear that EPA has embraced and is acting on the recommendations in the NRC formaldehyde report. The recommendations of this report should be seen as building on the progress that EPA has already made.
- Contents:
- ""Front Matter""; ""Preface""; ""Abbreviations""; ""Contents""; ""Review of EPA's Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) Process""; ""Summary""; ""1 Introduction""; ""2 General Process Issues""; ""3 Problem Formulation and Protocol Development""; ""4 Evidence Identification""; ""5 Evidence Evaluation""; ""6 Evidence Integration for Hazard Identification""; ""7 Derivation of Toxicity Values""; ""8 Future Directions""; ""Appendix A: Biographic Information on the Committee to Review the IRIS Process""; ""Appendix B: Workshop Agenda on Weight of Evidence""
- ""Appendix C: Primer on Bayesian Method""
- Notes:
- Description based upon print version of record.
- Includes bibliographical references.
- Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (ebrary, viewed July 17, 2014).
- ISBN:
- 0-309-30417-2
- 0-309-30415-6
- OCLC:
- 923290917
The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.