My Account Log in

7 options

Constitutional originalism : a debate / Robert W. Bennett and Lawrence B. Solum.

De Gruyter Cornell University Press eBook Package 2000-2013 Available online

View online

EBSCOhost Academic eBook Collection (North America) Available online

View online

EBSCOhost eBook Community College Collection Available online

View online

Ebook Central Academic Complete Available online

View online

Ebook Central College Complete Available online

View online

Ebook Central University Press Available online

View online

Ebscohost Ebooks University Press Collection (North America) Available online

View online
Format:
Book
Author/Creator:
Bennett, Robert W. (Robert William), 1941-
Contributor:
Solum, Lawrence.
Language:
English
Subjects (All):
Constitutional law--United States.
Constitutional law.
Law--United States.
Law.
Physical Description:
1 online resource (222 p.)
Edition:
1st ed.
Place of Publication:
Ithaca, N.Y. : Cornell University Press, 2011.
Language Note:
English
Summary:
Problems of constitutional interpretation have many faces, but much of the contemporary discussion has focused on what has come to be called "originalism." The core of originalism is the belief that fidelity to the original understanding of the Constitution should constrain contemporary judges. As originalist thinking has evolved, it has become clear that there is a family of originalist theories, some emphasizing the intent of the framers, while others focus on the original public meaning of the constitutional text. This idea has enjoyed a modern resurgence, in good part in reaction to the assumption of more sweeping power by the judiciary, operating in the name of constitutional interpretation. Those arguing for a "living Constitution" that keeps up with a changing world and changing values have resisted originalism. This difference in legal philosophy and jurisprudence has, since the 1970's, spilled over into party politics and the partisan wrangling over court appointments from appellate courts to the Supreme Court. In Constitutional Originalism, Robert W. Bennett and Lawrence B. Solum elucidate the two sides of this debate and mediate between them in order to separate differences that are real from those that are only apparent. In a thorough exploration of the range of contemporary views on originalism, the authors articulate and defend sharply contrasting positions. Solum brings learning from the philosophy of language to his argument in favor of originalism, and Bennett highlights interpretational problems in the dispute-resolution context, describing instances in which a living Constitution is a more feasible and productive position. The book explores those contrasting positions, to be sure, but also uncovers important points of agreement for the interpretational enterprise. This provocative and absorbing book ends with a bibliographic essay that points to landmark works in the field and helps lay readers and students orient themselves within the literature of the debate.
Contents:
Front matter
Contents
Preface
We Are All Originalists Now / Solum, Lawrence B.
Originalism and the Living American Constitution / Bennett, Robert W.
Living with Originalism
Are We All Living Constitutionalists Now?
Notes
Suggested Readings
Index
Notes:
Description based upon print version of record.
Description based on print version record and CIP data provided by publisher; resource not viewed.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN:
9780801461118
0801461111
9780801460630
0801460638
OCLC:
742515530

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Library Catalog Using Articles+ Library Account