My Account Log in

3 options

The debate over slavery : antislavery and proslavery liberalism in antebellum America / David F. Ericson.

De Gruyter New York University Press Backlist 2000-2013 Available online

View online

Ebook Central Academic Complete Available online

View online

Ebook Central College Complete Available online

View online
Format:
Book
Author/Creator:
Ericson, David F., 1950-
Language:
English
Subjects (All):
Antislavery movements--United States--History--19th century.
Antislavery movements.
Slavery--Political aspects--United States--History--19th century.
Slavery.
Slavery--Southern States--Justification.
Liberalism--United States--History--19th century.
Liberalism.
Abolitionists--United States--History--19th century.
Abolitionists.
United States--Intellectual life--19th century.
United States.
Southern States--Intellectual life.
Southern States.
Southern States--Race relations.
Physical Description:
1 online resource (253 p.)
Edition:
1st ed.
Place of Publication:
New York : New York University Press, c2000.
Language Note:
English
Summary:
Frederick Douglass and George Fitzhugh disagreed on virtually every major issue of the day. On slavery, women's rights, and the preservation of the Union their opinions were diametrically opposed. Where Douglass thundered against the evils of slavery, Fitzhugh counted its many alleged blessings in ways that would make modern readers cringe. What then could the leading abolitionist of the day and the most prominent southern proslavery intellectual possibly have in common? According to David F. Ericson, the answer is as surprising as it is simple; liberalism. In The Debate Over Slavery David F. Ericson makes the controversial argument that despite their many ostensible differences, most Northern abolitionists and Southern defenders of slavery shared many common commitments: to liberal principles; to the nation; to the nation's special mission in history; and to secular progress. He analyzes, side-by-side, pro and antislavery thinkers such as Lydia Marie Child, Frederick Douglass, Wendell Phillips, Thomas R. Dew, and James Fitzhugh to demonstrate the links between their very different ideas and to show how, operating from liberal principles, they came to such radically different conclusions. His raises disturbing questions about liberalism that historians, philosophers, and political scientists cannot afford to ignore.
Contents:
Front matter
Contents
Acknowledgments
1. The Liberal Consensus Thesis and Slavery
2. The Antislavery and Proslavery Arguments
3. Child, Douglass, and Antislavery Liberalism
4. Wendell Phillips
5. Dew, Fitzhugh, and Proslavery Liberalism
6. James H. Hammond
7. The “House Divided” and Civil-War Causation
Notes
Index
About the Author
Notes:
Description based upon print version of record.
Includes bibliographical references (p. 167-233) and index.
ISBN:
0-8147-2290-3
0-585-47187-8
OCLC:
784884442

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Library Catalog Using Articles+ Library Account