4 options
The myth of judicial activism : making sense of Supreme Court decisions / Kermit Roosevelt III.
- Format:
- Book
- Author/Creator:
- Roosevelt, Kermit, 1971-
- Language:
- English
- Subjects (All):
- Political questions and judicial power--United States.
- Political questions and judicial power.
- United States. Supreme Court.
- United States.
- Physical Description:
- 1 online resource (272 p.)
- Edition:
- 1st ed.
- Place of Publication:
- New Haven : Yale University Press, c2006.
- Language Note:
- English
- Summary:
- This carefully considered book is a welcome addition to the debate over judicial activism. Constitutional scholar Kermit Roosevelt III offers an elegantly simple way to resolve the heated discord between conservatives, who argue that the Constitution is immutable, and progressives, who insist that it is a living document that must be reinterpreted in new cultural contexts so that its meaning evolves. Roosevelt uses plain language and compelling examples to explain how the Constitution can be both a constant and an organic document. Recent years have witnessed an increasing drumbeat of complaints about judicial behavior, focusing particularly on Supreme Court decisions that critics charge are reflections of the Justices political preferences rather than enforcement of the Constitution. The author takes a balanced look at these controversial decisions through a compelling new lens of constitutional interpretation. He clarifies the task of the Supreme Court in constitutional cases, then sets out a model to describe how the Court creates doctrine to implement the meaning of the Constitution. Finally, Roosevelt uses this model to show which decisions can be justified as legitimate and which cannot.
- Contents:
- The plain meaning of the constitution : the fallacy of direct enforcement
- The model : what doctrine is for
- From activism to legitimacy
- Equal protection, criminal procedure, executive detention
- Gay rights : Romer, Lawrence, and Goodridge
- Abortion : Roe and Casey
- Takings : Kelo v. City of New London
- The establishment clause
- The death penalty : Roper and Atkins
- The First Amendment : campaign finance reform
- Refusing to defer
- Reviled decisions
- Branches behaving badly : whom do you trust?
- Notes:
- Bibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph
- Includes bibliographical references (p. [237]-246) and index.
- ISBN:
- 1-281-73036-X
- 9786611730369
- 0-300-12956-4
- OCLC:
- 923589660
The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.