My Account Log in

4 options

Decision making and juvenile justice : an analysis of bias in case processing / Paul E. Tracy.

EBSCOhost Academic eBook Collection (North America) Available online

View online

EBSCOhost eBook Community College Collection Available online

View online

Ebook Central Academic Complete Available online

View online

Ebook Central College Complete Available online

View online
Format:
Book
Author/Creator:
Tracy, Paul E.
Language:
English
Subjects (All):
Juvenile justice, Administration of--Decision making.
Juvenile justice, Administration of.
Discrimination in juvenile justice administration.
Physical Description:
1 online resource (207 p.)
Edition:
1st ed.
Distribution:
London : Bloomsbury Publishing, 2024
Place of Publication:
Westport, Conn. : Praeger, 2002.
Language Note:
English
Summary:
Based on a comprehensive study of three counties in Texas, this work examines the idea of differential handling of minority youth offenders. Traditional wisdom indicates that minorities are over-represented in the juvenile justice system due to racism and discrimination within the system itself. The author refutes this logic by challenging current studies and examining the results of the Texas study. The findings suggest that minorities are represented in the juvenile justice system in greater numbers than their majority offender counterparts due to their greater involvement in criminal activity, not to any differential treatment they may receive at crucial decision points within the system. Allegations of racial bias against the juvenile justice system are often supported by the federal government, which suggests that minorities continue to be targeted more frequently for arrest, prosecution, conviction, and imprisonment merely because they are persons of color. Drawing on new research, the author addresses racial disparity in the juvenile justice system and contends that previous research suffers methodological and statistical analysis problems, resulting in the mischaracterization of the issue of racial bias. The present study argues that most minority juveniles receive different case outcomes because of the severity of their current offense, and both the length and severity of their prior delinquency careers. Tracy's research ultimately indicates that rather than being discriminatory, the juvenile system is, instead, reacting to a particular type of delinquent using legally permissible guidelines.
Contents:
Cover
DECISION MAKING AND JUVENILE JUSTICE
Contents
Illustrations
FIGURES
TABLES
Acknowledgments
1 Introduction
ORIGIN OF DISPROPORTIONATE MINORITY CONFINEMENT: FEDERAL MANDATES
EXTENT OF DISPROPORTIONATE MINORITY CONFINEMENT: THE FEDERAL VIEW
MINORITIES AND CRIME
Differential Involvement
Differential Selection
PRESENT RESEARCH
2 Prior Research
POPE AND FEYERHERM ASSESSMENT OF THE LITERATURE
Research Setting
Sample Selection
Measurement of Variables
Mode of Statistical Analysis
Other Assessments
PRIOR RESEARCH
Detention at Intake
Prosecutor's Decision
Disposition
Limitations
3 Methods
BACKGROUND TO PRESENT RESEARCH
SAMPLE SELECTION
MEASUREMENT OF VARIABLES
Dependent Variables
Independent Variables
Measurement Problems
Sample Selection Bias
NOTE
4 Minority Overrepresentation: Aggregate Measures
AGGREGATE DATA
Arrest/Referral Ratios
Texas Juvenile Probation Commission (TJPC) Referral Data
Disproportionate Representation Index (DRI)
LIMITATIONS OF AGGREGATE DATA
5 Decision Making in County-1
DETENTION DECISIONS
All Cases
Males
Females
Conclusion
FORWARD A CASE TO THE DISTRICT AT TORNEY
DA'S DECISION TO PROSECUTE A CASE
PLACEMENT BY THE COURT
SUPPLEMENTARY ANALYSIS: DETENTION RECORDS
STATUS OFFENSES
OFFENSES COMMITTED BY ASIAN-AMERICAN YOUTH
COUNTY-1 SUMMARY
NOTES
6 Decision Making in County-2
DECISION TO FORWARD A CASE TO THE DA
Conclusion.
PLACEMENT BY THE COURT
COUNTY-2 SUMMARY
7 Decision Making in County-3
ALL CASES
DECISION TO REFER CASE TO COURT
SUMMARY
8 Survey of Juvenile Justice Practitioners
METHODS
Sample Demographics
SURVEY RESULTS
Minorities in the Juvenile Justice System
Views on the Juvenile Justice System in Texas
Views on Delinquency
Ratings of Factors by Respondents' Profile
Case Scenario Evaluation
CONCLUSION
9 Summary and Implications
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
Aggregate Measures of Delinquency
Case-Level Data
Survey of Practitioners
IMPLICATIONS
Race and Delinquency Involvement
Juvenile Justice Policy
Bibliography
Index
About the Author.
Notes:
Bibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph
Includes bibliographical references (p. [183]-190) and index.
ISBN:
9798400638541
9786610422760
9781280422768
1280422769
9780313010965
031301096X
OCLC:
232161595

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Library Catalog Using Articles+ Library Account