My Account Log in

4 options

The case against punishment : retribution, crime prevention, and the law / Deirdre Golash.

De Gruyter New York University Press Backlist 2000-2013 Available online

View online

EBSCOhost Academic eBook Collection (North America) Available online

View online

Ebook Central Academic Complete Available online

View online

Ebook Central College Complete Available online

View online
Format:
Book
Author/Creator:
Golash, Deirdre.
Language:
English
Subjects (All):
Punishment.
Physical Description:
1 online resource (230 p.)
Edition:
1st ed.
Place of Publication:
New York : New York University Press, c2005.
Language Note:
English
Summary:
What ends do we expect and hope to serve in punishing criminal wrongdoers? Does the punishment of offenders do more harm than good for American society? In The Case against Punishment, Deirdre Golash addresses these and other questions about the value of punishment in contemporary society. Drawing on both empirical evidence and philosophical literature, this book argues that the harm done by punishing criminal offenders is ultimately morally unjustified. Asserting that punishment inflicts both intended and unintended harms on offenders, Golash suggests that crime can be reduced by addressing social problems correlated with high crime rates, such as income inequality and local social disorganization. Punishment may reduce crime, but in so doing, causes a comparable amount of harm to offenders. Instead, Golash suggests, we should address criminal acts through trial, conviction, and compensation to the victim, while also providing the criminal with the opportunity to reconcile with society through morally good action rather than punishment.
Contents:
The Case Against Punishment
Front matter
Contents
Acknowledgments
1 An Institution in Search of Moral Grounding
I. Introduction
II. Harms Done by Punishment
III. Justifying the Harm of Punishment
2 Does Punishment Do More Good than Harm?
II. Crime-Preventive Effects of Punishment
III. Consideration of Alternatives
IV. Theoretical Objections
V. Conclusion
3 Preserving the Moral Order
I. Hegel
II. Punishment as Vindicating Victims
III. Punishment as Expressing Justified Anger
4 Retribution and Social Choice
II. Pure Retributivism
III. Retributive Punishment as Promoting Social Control
IV. Restitution
5 Punishment as Self-Defense
II. What Justifies Self-Defense?
III. Conclusion
6 Punishment as Communication
II. Moral Reform Theories
III. Paternalism
IV. Nonpaternalistic Goals
V. Aiming at the Good of the Offender
VI. Restoring Relationships
VII. Moral Reform in an Ideal Society
VIII. Conclusion
7 Is Punishment Justified?
I. Crime Prevention: Doing Good by Doing Harm
II. Harming Offenders as Good in Itself
III. Harming Offenders for Their Own Moral Good
IV. Conclusion
8 What if Punishment Is Not Justified?
II. Crime Prevention
III. Responding to Unprevented Crimes
Notes
Bibliography
Index
About the Author
Notes:
Description based upon print version of record.
Includes bibliographical references (p. 173-210) and index.
ISBN:
0-8147-3329-8
1-4294-1411-1
OCLC:
782877946

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

Find

Home Release notes

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Find catalog Using Articles+ Using your account