5 options
The critique of theological reason / James P. Mackey.
- Format:
- Book
- Author/Creator:
- Mackey, James P. (James Patrick), 1934- author.
- Language:
- English
- Subjects (All):
- Philosophical theology.
- Postmodernism--Religious aspects--Christianity.
- Postmodernism.
- Physical Description:
- 1 online resource (v, 333 pages) : digital, PDF file(s).
- Edition:
- 1st ed.
- Place of Publication:
- Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2000.
- Language Note:
- English
- Summary:
- Far from merely reinvigorating relativism, postmodernism has detected and expressed in our time a powerful nihilating process of which truth and reality itself are the final casualties; and with these morality and religion. Beginning from the theological reaches of philosophy, this book argues that gods played a crucial part in modern philosophy, even when it was most critical of them; that the dominant nihilism of Derrida is really an excessive and misleading outcome of a contemporary philosophy which could otherwise resonate with all that is best in our evolutionary image of the universe; that moralists who turn to art in order to overcome the fact-value version of this deadly dualism do not thereby rule out religion; and that a Christian theology which recognises the evolutionary and historical conditions of faith and revelation is once again producing a theology that builds upon the best of contemporary philosophy and science.
- Contents:
- pt. 1. Historical-Critical
- 1. The status quo: genesis
- 2. The status quo: current affairs
- 3. Beginnings: old and new
- pt. 2. Critical-Constructive
- 4. Morality and metaphysics
- 5. Art and the role of revelation
- 6. Revelation, religion and theology.
- Notes:
- Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015).
- Includes bibliographical references and index.
- ISBN:
- 1-107-11974-X
- 0-521-16923-2
- 0-511-17442-X
- 0-511-15436-4
- 0-511-48838-6
- 0-511-04981-1
- 1-280-42133-9
- OCLC:
- 559593554
The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.