My Account Log in

7 options

The fallacies of states' rights / Sotirios A. Barber.

De Gruyter Harvard University Press eBook Package Backlist 2000-2013 Available online

View online

EBSCOhost Academic eBook Collection (North America) Available online

View online

EBSCOhost Ebook Public Library Collection - North America Available online

View online

EBSCOhost eBook Community College Collection Available online

View online

Ebook Central Academic Complete Available online

View online

Ebook Central University Press Available online

View online

Ebscohost Ebooks University Press Collection (North America) Available online

View online
Format:
Book
Author/Creator:
Barber, Sotirios A.
Language:
English
Subjects (All):
Federal government--United States.
Federal government.
States' rights (American politics).
United States--Politics and government--Philosophy.
United States.
Physical Description:
1 online resource (245 pages)
Edition:
1st ed.
Place of Publication:
Cambridge, Mass. : Harvard University Press, 2013.
Language Note:
English
Summary:
The idea that "states' rights" restrain national power is riding high in American judicial and popular opinion. Here, Sotirios A. Barber shows how arguments for states' rights, from the days of John C. Calhoun to the present, have offended common sense, logic, and bedrock constitutional principles. To begin with, states' rights federalism cannot possibly win the debate with national federalism owing to the very forum in which the requisite argument must occur-a national one, thanks to the Civil War-and the ordinary rules of practical argumentation. Further, the political consequences of this self-defeating logic can only hasten the loss of American sovereignty to international economic forces. Both philosophical and practical reasons compel us to consider two historical alternatives to states' rights federalism. In the federalism of John Marshall, the nation's most renowned jurist, the national government's duty to ensure security, prosperity, and other legitimate national ends must take precedence over all conflicting exercises of state power. In "process" federalism, the Constitution protects the states by securing their roles in national policy making and other national decisions. Barber opts for Marshall's federalism, but the contest is close, and his analysis takes the debate into new, fertile territory. Affirming the fundamental importance of the Preamble, Barber advocates a conception of the Constitution as a charter of positive benefits for the nation. It is not, in his view, a contract among weak separate sovereigns whose primary function is to protect people from the central government, when there are greater dangers to confront.
Contents:
Introduction: America's oldest constitutional debate
Why the states can't check national power
John Marshall and a constitution for national security and prosperity
The implications of Marshallian federalism
Why states' rights federalism is impossible to defend
John C. Calhoun's false theory of the Union
States' rights as rights only to participate in national processes
Why Marshallians should (but may not) win the states' rights debate.
Notes:
Bibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN:
9780674070424
0674070429
9780674067967
0674067967
OCLC:
1004875437

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Library Catalog Using Articles+ Library Account