My Account Log in

3 options

Defining the sovereign community : the Czech and Slovak Republics / Nadya Nedelsky.

De Gruyter University of Pennsylvania Press eBook Package Backlist 2000-2013 Available online

View online

Ebook Central Academic Complete Available online

View online

Ebook Central University Press Available online

View online
Format:
Book
Author/Creator:
Nedelsky, Nadya.
Series:
Democracy, citizenship, and constitutionalism.
Democracy, citizenship, and constitutionalism
Language:
English
Subjects (All):
Public administration--Czech Republic.
Public administration.
Public administration--Slovakia.
Czech Republic--Politics and government--1993-.
Czech Republic.
Slovakia--Politics and government--1993-.
Slovakia.
Czechoslovakia--Politics and government.
Czechoslovakia.
Physical Description:
1 online resource (351 p.)
Edition:
1st ed.
Place of Publication:
Philadelphia : University of Pennsylvania Press, c2009.
Language Note:
English
Summary:
Though they shared a state for most of the twentieth century, when the Czechs and Slovaks split in 1993 they founded their new states on different definitions of sovereignty. The Czech Constitution employs a civic model, founding the state in the name of "the citizens of the Czech Republic," while the Slovak Constitution uses the more exclusive ethnic model and speaks in the voice of "the Slovak Nation."Defining the Sovereign Community asks two central questions. First, why did the two states define sovereignty so differently? Second, what impact have these choices had on individual and minority rights and participation in the two states? Nadya Nedelsky examines how the Czechs and Slovaks understood nationhood over the course of a century and a half and finds that their views have been remarkably resilient over time.These enduring perspectives on nationhood shaped how the two states defined sovereignty after the Velvet Revolution, which in turn strongly affected the status of the Hungarian minority in Slovakia and the Roma minority in the Czech Republic. Neither state has secured civic equality, but the nature of the discrimination against minorities differs. Using the civic definition of sovereignty offers stronger support for civil and minority rights than an ethnic model does. Nedelsky's conclusions challenge much analysis of the region, which tends to explain ethnic politics by focusing on postcommunist factors, especially the role of opportunistic political leaders. Defining the Sovereign Community instead examines the undervalued historical roots of political culture and the role of current constitutional definitions of sovereignty. Looking ahead, Nedelsky offers crucial evidence that nationalism may remain strong in Slovakia and the Czech Republic, even in the face of democratization and EU integration, and is an important threat to both.
Contents:
Frontmatter
Contents
Introduction
Chapter One: Awakenings
Chapter Two: Nation-Building in the Empire's Waning Years
Chapter Three: The First Republic: Czechoslovakism and Its Discontents
Chapter Four: The Second Republic and the Wartime Slovak State
Chapter Five: The Third Republic: "Putting an End to All Old Disputes"
Chapter Six: The Communist Period: New Vows
Chapter Seven: From Velvet Revolution to Velvet Divorce
Chapter Eight: The Implications of the Ethnic Model of Sovereignty in Slovakia
Chapter Nine: The Implications of the Civic Model of Sovereignty in the Czech Republic
Conclusion
Notes
Index
Acknowledgments
Notes:
Bibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN:
9781283890786
128389078X
9780812202892
0812202899
OCLC:
794702350

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

Find

Home Release notes

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Find catalog Using Articles+ Using your account