My Account Log in

5 options

Physicalism, or something near enough / Jaegwon Kim.

De Gruyter Princeton University Press eBook-Package Backlist 2000-2013 Available online

View online

EBSCOhost Academic eBook Collection (North America) Available online

View online

Ebook Central Academic Complete Available online

View online

Ebook Central University Press Available online

View online

Ebscohost Ebooks University Press Collection (North America) Available online

View online
Format:
Book
Author/Creator:
Kim, Jaegwon.
Series:
Princeton monographs in philosophy.
Princeton monographs in philosophy
Language:
English
Subjects (All):
Philosophy of mind.
Mind and body.
Physical Description:
1 online resource (201 p.)
Edition:
Course Book
Place of Publication:
Princeton, N.J. : Princeton University Press, c2005.
Language Note:
English
Summary:
Contemporary discussions in philosophy of mind have largely been shaped by physicalism, the doctrine that all phenomena are ultimately physical. Here, Jaegwon Kim presents the most comprehensive and systematic presentation yet of his influential ideas on the mind-body problem. He seeks to determine, after half a century of debate: What kind of (or "how much") physicalism can we lay claim to? He begins by laying out mental causation and consciousness as the two principal challenges to contemporary physicalism. How can minds exercise their causal powers in a physical world? Is a physicalist account of consciousness possible? The book's starting point is the "supervenience" argument (sometimes called the "exclusion" argument), which Kim reformulates in an extended defense. This argument shows that the contemporary physicalist faces a stark choice between reductionism (the idea that mental phenomena are physically reducible) and epiphenomenalism (the view that mental phenomena are causally impotent). Along the way, Kim presents a novel argument showing that Cartesian substance dualism offers no help with mental causation. Mind-body reduction, therefore, is required to save mental causation. But are minds physically reducible? Kim argues that all but one type of mental phenomena are reducible, including intentional mental phenomena, such as beliefs and desires. The apparent exceptions are the intrinsic, felt qualities of conscious experiences ("qualia"). Kim argues, however, that certain relational properties of qualia, in particular their similarities and differences, are behaviorally manifest and hence in principle reducible, and that it is these relational properties of qualia that are central to their cognitive roles. The causal efficacy of qualia, therefore, is not entirely lost. According to Kim, then, while physicalism is not the whole truth, it is the truth near enough.
Contents:
Front matter
Contents
Preface
Synopsis of the Arguments
CHAPTER 1. Mental Causation and Consciousness: Our Two Mind-Body Problems
CHAPTER 2. The Supervenience Argument Motivated, Clarified, and Defended
CHAPTER 4. Reduction, Reductive Explanation, and Closing the "Gap"
CHAPTER 5. Explanatory Arguments for Type Physicalism and Why They Don't Work
CHAPTER 6. Physicalism, or Something Near Enough
References
Index
Notes:
"Third printing, and first paperback printing, 2008."
Includes bibliographical references and index.
Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources.
ISBN:
9786613133465
9781283133463
1283133466
9781400840847
1400840848
OCLC:
730151750

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

Find

Home Release notes

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Find catalog Using Articles+ Using your account