My Account Log in

6 options

Citizens, courts, and confirmations : positivity theory and the judgments of the American people / James L. Gibson and Gregory A. Caldeira.

De Gruyter Princeton University Press eBook-Package Backlist 2000-2013 Available online

View online

EBSCOhost Academic eBook Collection (North America) Available online

View online

EBSCOhost eBook Community College Collection Available online

View online

Ebook Central Academic Complete Available online

View online

Ebook Central University Press Available online

View online

Ebscohost Ebooks University Press Collection (North America) Available online

View online
Format:
Book
Author/Creator:
Gibson, James L., 1951-
Contributor:
Caldeira, Gregory A.
Language:
English
Subjects (All):
Judges--Selection and appointment--United States.
Judges.
Public opinion--United States.
Public opinion.
United States. Supreme Court--Officials and employees--Selection and appointment.
United States.
Alito, Samuel A., Jr., 1950-.
Alito, Samuel A.
Physical Description:
1 online resource (195 p.)
Edition:
Course Book
Place of Publication:
Princeton, N.J. : Princeton University Press, c2009.
Language Note:
English
Summary:
In recent years the American public has witnessed several hard-fought battles over nominees to the U.S. Supreme Court. In these heated confirmation fights, candidates' legal and political philosophies have been subject to intense scrutiny and debate. Citizens, Courts, and Confirmations examines one such fight--over the nomination of Samuel Alito--to discover how and why people formed opinions about the nominee, and to determine how the confirmation process shaped perceptions of the Supreme Court's legitimacy. Drawing on a nationally representative survey, James Gibson and Gregory Caldeira use the Alito confirmation fight as a window into public attitudes about the nation's highest court. They find that Americans know far more about the Supreme Court than many realize, that the Court enjoys a great deal of legitimacy among the American people, that attitudes toward the Court as an institution generally do not suffer from partisan or ideological polarization, and that public knowledge enhances the legitimacy accorded the Court. Yet the authors demonstrate that partisan and ideological infighting that treats the Court as just another political institution undermines the considerable public support the institution currently enjoys, and that politicized confirmation battles pose a grave threat to the basic legitimacy of the Supreme Court.
Contents:
Introduction : the public and supreme court nominations
Knowing about courts
The popular legitimacy of the United States Supreme Court
Institutional loyalty, positivity bias, and the Alito nomination
A dynamic test of the positivity bias hypothesis
Concluding thoughts, theory, and policy.
Notes:
Description based upon print version of record.
Includes bibliographical references (p. [163]-174) and index.
ISBN:
9786612820953
9781282820951
1282820958
9781400830602
1400830605
OCLC:
670429817

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

Find

Home Release notes

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Find catalog Using Articles+ Using your account