My Account Log in

4 options

Breaking the deadlock : the 2000 election, the constitution, and the courts / Richard A. Posner.

De Gruyter Princeton University Press eBook-Package Backlist 2000-2013 Available online

View online

EBSCOhost Academic eBook Collection (North America) Available online

View online

Ebook Central University Press Available online

View online

Ebscohost Ebooks University Press Collection (North America) Available online

View online
Format:
Book
Author/Creator:
Posner, Richard A.
Language:
English
Subjects (All):
Bush, George W. (George Walker), 1946---Trials, litigation, etc.
Bush, George W.
Gore, Al, 1948---Trials, litigation, etc.
Gore, Al.
Contested elections--United States.
Contested elections.
Presidents--United States--Election--2000.
Presidents.
Law--Political aspects.
Law.
Physical Description:
1 online resource (286 p.)
Edition:
Core Textbook
Place of Publication:
Princeton, N.J. : Princeton University Press, c2001.
Language Note:
English
Summary:
The 2000 Presidential election ended in a collision of history, law, and the courts. It produced a deadlock that dragged out the result for over a month, and consequences--real and imagined--that promise to drag on for years. In the first in-depth study of the election and its litigious aftermath, Judge Posner surveys the history and theory of American electoral law and practice, analyzes which Presidential candidate ''really'' won the popular vote in Florida, surveys the litigation that ensued, evaluates the courts, the lawyers, and the commentators, and ends with a blueprint for reforming our Presidential electoral practices.The book starts with an overview of the electoral process, including its history and guiding theories. It looks next at the Florida election itself, exploring which candidate ''really'' won and whether this is even a meaningful question. The focus then shifts to the complex litigation, both state and federal, provoked by the photo finish. On the basis of the pragmatic jurisprudence that Judge Posner has articulated and defended in his previous writings, this book offers an alternative justification for the Supreme Court's decision in Bush v. Gore while praising the Court for averting the chaotic consequences of an unresolved deadlock.Posner also evaluates the performance of the lawyers who conducted the post-election litigation and of the academics who commented on the unfolding drama. He argues that neither Gore's nor Bush's lawyers blundered seriously, but that the reaction of the legal professoriat to the litigation exposed serious flaws in the academic practice of constitutional law. While rejecting such radical moves as abolishing the Electoral College or creating a national ballot, Posner concludes with a detailed plan of feasible reforms designed to avoid a repetition of the 2000 election fiasco.Lawyers, political scientists, pundits, and politicians are waiting to hear what Judge Posner has to say. But this book is written for and will be welcomed by all who were riveted by the recent crisis of presidential succession.
Contents:
Frontmatter
Contents
Preface
Chronology of the Deadlock
Glossary of Election Terms
Introduction
Chapter 1. The Road to Florida 2000
Chapter 2. The Deadlocked Election
Chapter 3. The Postelection Struggle in the Courts
Chapter 4. Critiquing the Participants
Chapter 5. Consequences and Reforms
Conclusion
Index
Notes:
Description based upon print version of record.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN:
9786612767173
9781400810765
1400810760
9781282767171
1282767178
9781400824281
1400824281
OCLC:
697175255

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

Find

Home Release notes

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Find catalog Using Articles+ Using your account