My Account Log in

7 options

Black robes, white coats : the puzzle of judicial policymaking and scientific evidence / Rebecca C. Harris.

De Gruyter Rutgers University Press Backlist eBook-Package 2000-2013 Available online

View online

EBSCOhost Academic eBook Collection (North America) Available online

View online

EBSCOhost eBook Community College Collection Available online

View online

Ebook Central Academic Complete Available online

View online

Ebook Central College Complete Available online

View online

Ebook Central University Press Available online

View online

Ebscohost Ebooks University Press Collection (North America) Available online

View online
Format:
Book
Author/Creator:
Harris, Rebecca C., 1972-
Language:
English
Subjects (All):
Evidence, Expert--United States.
Evidence, Expert.
Admissible evidence--United States.
Admissible evidence.
State courts--United States.
State courts.
Judicial discretion--United States.
Judicial discretion.
Physical Description:
1 online resource (212 p.)
Edition:
1st ed.
Place of Publication:
New Brunswick, N.J. : Rutgers University Press, c2008.
Language Note:
English
Summary:
Scientific evidence is commonplace in today's criminal trials. From hair and handwriting analysis to ink and DNA fingerprints, scientists have brought their world to bear on the justice system. Combining political analysis, scientific reasoning, and an in-depth study of specific state supreme court cases, Black Robes, White Coats is an interdisciplinary examination of the tradition of "gatekeeping," the practice of deciding the admissibility of novel scientific evidence. Rebecca Harris systematically examines judicial policymaking in three areas forensic DNA, polygraphs, and psychological syndrome evidence to answer the question: Why is scientific evidence treated differently among various jurisdictions? These decisions have important implications for evaluating our judicial system and its ability to accurately develop scientific policy. While the interaction of these professions occurs because the white coats often develop and ascertain knowledge deemed very useful to the black robes, Harris concludes that the black robes are well positioned to render appropriate rulings and determine the acceptability of harnessing a particular science for legal purposes. First book to systematically gather and analyze judicial decisions on scientific admissibility Analyzes several key cases including Arizona v. Bible and Kansas v. Marks Includes examples of evidence in three appendices: forensic DNA, polygraph evidence, and syndrome evidence Presents an original model of the gatekeeping process
Contents:
Frontmatter
Contents
List of Tables
Introduction
1. The Mystery of the Gatekeepers
2. Clues to Judicial Behavior
3. Forensic DNA: Law Enforcement in the Laboratory
4. Lie Detection: Victim of Law and Politics
5. Syndrome Evidence: Science Isn't Everything
6. Gatekeepers and the Politics of Knowledge
7. New Clues? Gatekeeping and the Twenty-first Century
Appendix A. State Supreme Court Cases for Forensic DNA
Appendix B. State Supreme Court Decisions for Polygraph Evidence
Appendix C. State Supreme Court Decisions for Syndrome Evidence
Notes
Bibliography
Index
About the Author
Notes:
Description based upon print version of record.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN:
1-281-80173-9
9786611801731
0-8135-4564-1
OCLC:
476191021

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

Find

Home Release notes

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Find catalog Using Articles+ Using your account