My Account Log in

5 options

A third concept of liberty : judgment and freedom in Kant and Adam Smith / Samuel Fleischacker.

De Gruyter Princeton University Press eBook Package Archive 1927-1999 Available online

View online

EBSCOhost Academic eBook Collection (North America) Available online

View online

Ebook Central Academic Complete Available online

View online

Ebook Central University Press Available online

View online

Ebscohost Ebooks University Press Collection (North America) Available online

View online
Format:
Book
Author/Creator:
Fleischacker, Samuel.
Language:
English
Subjects (All):
Kant, Immanuel, 1724-1804--Contributions in political science.
Kant, Immanuel.
Smith, Adam, 1723-1790.
Smith, Adam.
Liberty.
Judgment (Ethics).
Physical Description:
1 online resource (351 p.)
Edition:
Core Textbook
Place of Publication:
Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press, 1999.
Language Note:
English
Summary:
Taking the title of his book from Isaiah Berlin's famous essay distinguishing a negative concept of liberty connoting lack of interference by others from a positive concept involving participation in the political realm, Samuel Fleischacker explores a third definition of liberty that lies between the first two. In Fleischacker's view, Kant and Adam Smith think of liberty as a matter of acting on our capacity for judgment, thereby differing both from those who tie it to the satisfaction of our desires and those who translate it as action in accordance with reason or "will." Integrating the thought of Kant and Smith, and developing his own stand through readings of the Critique of Judgment and The Wealth of Nations, Fleischacker shows how different acting on one's best judgment is from acting on one's desires--how, in particular, good judgment, as opposed to mere desire, can flourish only in favorable social and political conditions. At the same time, exercising judgment is something every individual must do for him- or herself, hence not something that philosophers and politicians who reason better than the rest of us can do in our stead. For this reason advocates of a liberty based on judgment are likely to be more concerned than are libertarians to make sure that government provides people with conditions for the use of their liberty--for example, excellent standards of education, health care, and unemployment insurance--while at the same time promoting a less paternalistic view of government than most of the movements associated for the past thirty years with the political left.
Contents:
Front matter
CONTENTS
PREFACE
ABBREVIATIONS
INTRODUCTION
PART I: THE NATURE OF JUDGMENT
PART II: THE POLITICS OF JUDGMENT
PART III: THE FREEDOM OF JUDGMENT
NOTES
INDEX
Notes:
Description based upon print version of record.
Includes bibliographical references (p. [279]-327) and index.
ISBN:
9786612753664
9781400815906
1400815908
9781282753662
1282753665
9781400822942
1400822947
OCLC:
700688573

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

Find

Home Release notes

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Find catalog Using Articles+ Using your account