3 options
A rationale of textual criticism / G. Thomas Tanselle.
De Gruyter University of Pennsylvania Press eBook Package Archive 1898-1999 Available online
View online- Format:
- Book
- Author/Creator:
- Tanselle, G. Thomas (George Thomas), 1934-
- Series:
- Publication of the A.S.W. Rosenbach fellowship in bibliography.
- A Publication of the A.S.W. Rosenbach fellowship in bibliography
- Language:
- English
- Subjects (All):
- Criticism, Textual.
- Physical Description:
- 1 online resource (105 pages)
- Edition:
- 1st ed.
- Place of Publication:
- Philadelphia : University of Pennsylvania Press, 1989.
- Language Note:
- English
- Summary:
- Textual criticism—the traditional term for the task of evaluating the authority of the words and punctuation of a text—is often considered an undertaking preliminary to literary criticism: many people believe that the job of textual critics is to provide reliable texts for literary critics to analyze. G. Thomas Tanselle argues, on the contrary, that the two activities cannot be separated. The textual critic, in choosing among textual variants and correcting what appear to be textual errors, inevitably exercises critical judgment and reflects a particular point of view toward the nature of literature. And the literary critic, in interpreting the meaning of a work or passage, needs to be (though rarely is) critical of the makeup of every text of it, including those produced by scholarly editors.
- Contents:
- Front matter
- CONTENTS
- Preface
- 1. The Nature of Texts
- 2. Reproducing the Texts of Documents
- 3. Reconstructing the Texts of Works
- Postscript
- INDEX
- Notes:
- Slightly rev. lectures delivered on Apr. 21, 23, and 28, 1987 as the Rosenbach lectures at the University of Pennsylvania.
- First paperback printing 1992.
- Includes bibliographical references and index.
- ISBN:
- 9786613210906
- 9781283210904
- 1283210908
- 9780812200423
- 081220042X
- 9780585127422
- 0585127425
- OCLC:
- 606505965
The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.