My Account Log in

7 options

Scientific evidence and equal protection of the law / Angelo N. Ancheta.

De Gruyter Rutgers University Press Backlist eBook-Package 2000-2013 Available online

View online

EBSCOhost Academic eBook Collection (North America) Available online

View online

EBSCOhost eBook Community College Collection Available online

View online

Ebook Central Academic Complete Available online

View online

Ebook Central College Complete Available online

View online

Ebook Central University Press Available online

View online

Ebscohost Ebooks University Press Collection (North America) Available online

View online
Format:
Book
Author/Creator:
Ancheta, Angelo N., 1960-
Language:
English
Subjects (All):
Discrimination--Law and legislation--United States.
Discrimination.
Equality before the law--United States.
Equality before the law.
Discrimination--Research--United States.
Equality before the law--Research--United States.
Science and law.
Physical Description:
1 online resource (208 p.)
Edition:
1st ed.
Place of Publication:
New Brunswick, N.J. : Rutgers University Press, c2006.
Language Note:
English
Summary:
Scientific and social scientific evidence has informed judicial decisions and the making of constitutional law for decades, but for much of U.S. history it has also served as a rhetorical device to justify inequality. It is only in recent years that scientific and statistical research has helped redress discrimination—but not without controversy. Scientific Evidence and Equal Protection of the Law provides unique insights into the judicial process and scientific inquiry by examining major decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court, civil rights advocacy, and the nature of science itself. Angelo Ancheta discusses leading equal protection cases such as Brown v. Board of Education and recent litigation involving race-related affirmative action, gender inequality, and discrimination based on sexual orientation. He also examines less prominent, but equally compelling cases, including McCleskey v. Kemp, which involved statistical evidence that a state’s death penalty was disproportionately used when victims were white and defendants were black, and Castaneda v. Partida, which established key standards of evidence in addressing the exclusion of Latinos from grand jury service. For each case, Ancheta explores the tensions between scientific findings and constitutional values.
Contents:
Science and law, ideology, and inequality
Desegregation and "modern authority"
Science and equal protection
Proving discrimination
Science, advocacy, and fact finding
Directions and conclusions.
Notes:
Description based upon print version of record.
Includes bibliographical references (p. 179-183) and index.
ISBN:
1-283-59870-1
9786613911155
0-8135-3931-5
OCLC:
811505210

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Library Catalog Using Articles+ Library Account