My Account Log in

5 options

Debating war and peace : media coverage of U.S. intervention in the post-Vietnam era / Jonathan Mermin.

Communication Source Available from 1999. Available online

View online

De Gruyter Princeton University Press eBook Package Archive 1927-1999 Available online

View online

EBSCOhost Academic eBook Collection (North America) Available online

View online

Ebook Central University Press Available online

View online

Ebscohost Ebooks University Press Collection (North America) Available online

View online
Format:
Book
Author/Creator:
Mermin, Jonathan, 1966-
Language:
English
Subjects (All):
War in mass media.
Mass media--United States.
Mass media.
United States--Military policy.
United States.
United States--Foreign relations.
Physical Description:
1 online resource (175 p.)
Edition:
Core Textbook
Place of Publication:
Princeton, N.J. : Princeton University Press, c1999.
Language Note:
English
Summary:
The First Amendment ideal of an independent press allows American journalists to present critical perspectives on government policies and actions; but are the media independent of government in practice? Here Jonathan Mermin demonstrates that when it comes to military intervention, journalists over the past two decades have let the government itself set the terms and boundaries of foreign policy debate in the news. Analyzing newspaper and television reporting of U.S. intervention in Grenada and Panama, the bombing of Libya, the Gulf War, and U.S. actions in Somalia and Haiti, he shows that if there is no debate over U.S. policy in Washington, there is no debate in the news. Journalists often criticize the execution of U.S. policy, but fail to offer critical analysis of the policy itself if actors inside the government have not challenged it. Mermin ultimately offers concrete evidence of outside-Washington perspectives that could have been reported in specific cases, and explains how the press could increase its independence of Washington in reporting foreign policy news. The author constructs a new framework for thinking about press-government relations, based on the observation that bipartisan support for U.S. intervention is often best interpreted as a political phenomenon, not as evidence of the wisdom of U.S. policy. Journalists should remember that domestic political factors often influence foreign policy debate. The media, Mermin argues, should not see a Washington consensus as justification for downplaying critical perspectives.
Contents:
Front matter
Contents
Tables
Preface
One. Introduction
Two. The Spectrum of Debate in the News
Three. Grenada and Panama
Four. The Buildup to the Gulf War
Five. The Rule and Some Exceptions
Six. Television News and the Foreign-Policy Agenda
Seven. Conclusion
Appendix
Index
Notes:
Description based upon print version of record.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN:
9786612753886
9781400805341
1400805341
9781400817160
1400817161
9781400812684
1400812682
9781282753884
1282753886
9781400823321
1400823323
OCLC:
700688649

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

Find

Home Release notes

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Find catalog Using Articles+ Using your account