My Account Log in

4 options

Preserving public trust : accreditation and human research participant protection programs / Committee on Assessing the System for Protecting Human Research Subjects, Board on Health Sciences Policy, Institute of Medicine.

EBSCOhost Academic eBook Collection (North America) Available online

View online

Ebook Central Academic Complete Available online

View online

NCBI Bookshelf Available online

View online

National Academies Press Available online

View online
Format:
Book
Author/Creator:
Institute of Medicine (U.S.). Committee on Assessing the System for Protecting Human Research Subjects.
Language:
English
Subjects (All):
Human experimentation in medicine--Standards--United States.
Human experimentation in medicine.
Informed consent (Medical law)--United States.
Informed consent (Medical law).
Physical Description:
1 online resource (232 p.)
Edition:
1st ed.
Place of Publication:
Washington, D.C. ; [Great Britain] : National Academy Press, c2001.
Language Note:
English
Summary:
This report was produced by the Institute of Medicine's Committee on Assessing the System for Protecting Human Research Subjects. The report explores a variety of issues related to the safety and rights of the participants in clinical research, including informed consent, the right of subjects to say no and the choice to change one's mind, the ability of institutional review boards to handle the complex responsibilities given to them, and the ability to organize and monitor this "nonsystem of evolutionarily unprecedented human behavior" in order to "maximize its glorious potential and control its dark risks." The report suggests ways in which accreditation might contribute to a new level of excellence. Annotation copyrighted by Book News Inc., Portland, OR.
Contents:
Preserving Public Trust: Accreditation and Human Research Participant Protection Programs
Copyright
Preface
REVIEWERS
Acronyms
Contents
Executive Summary
ABSTRACT
THE COMMITTEE'S TASK
MAJOR FINDINGS
RECOMMENDATIONS
CONCLUDING REMARKS
1 Introduction, Background, and Definitions
ORGANIZATION OF THE REPORT
A SHORT HISTORY OF HUMAN SUBJECTS PROTECTIONS IN THE UNITED STATES
MORE RECENT EVENTS
Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments
The National Bioethics Advisory Commission
Reports from DHHS Office of the Inspector General
Shutdowns of Clinical Research at Academic and VA Medical Centers
The Death of Jesse Gelsinger
A CALL FOR ACCOUNTABILITY
STATEMENT OF TASK
DEFINITIONS
Subject or Participant?
What Is a Human Research Participant Protection Program?
The Centrality of Informed Consent
The Rise of Clinical Trials and Privately Funded Research
Nonbiomedical Research
Independent IRBs
Sponsors
The Role of the Research Participant
Research Monitoring
Accreditation Versus Certification
2 Models of Accreditation
MODELS OF ACCREDITATION
ELEMENTS OF AN ACCREDITATION PROCESS
Accreditation Bodies
PRIM&amp
R and the Formation of AAHRPP
The VA and NCQA Accreditation Process
Eligibility Criteria and an Application Process
Self-Evaluation
External Evaluation
Appeals Process
Repeat Accreditation
APPLYING THE MODELS TO HUMAN RESEARCH OVERSIGHT
SOME ISSUES THAT ACCREDITATION ALONE CANNOT ADDRESS
Identifying, Investigating, and Sanctioning Violations
Educating Investigators
Improving Research Monitoring
WILL ACCREDITATION ENHANCE PERFORMANCE?
3 Standards for Accreditation
STANDARDS FOR STANDARDS
DEVELOPING MEASURES TO ACCOMPANY STANDARDS.
NEED FOR STANDARDS TO ENCOMPASS MULTIPLE RESEARCH SETTINGS AND METHODS
RELATION OF THE STANDARDS TO THE EXISTING REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS
STANDARDS FOR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT AND SELF-STUDY
NEED FOR STANDARDS TO ENHANCE THE ROLE OF RESEARCH PARTICIPANTS
NEED FOR STANDARDS REGARDING ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF RESEARCH SPONSORS
REVIEW OF AVAILABLE DRAFT STANDARDS
Scope and Focus of the Standards
R Standards
NCQA Standards
Relation to Existing Regulatory Requirements
Extent to Which the Standards Can Be Implemented, Measured, and Enforced
What Is Missing
INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HARMONISATION GUIDELINE FOR GOOD CLINICAL PRACTICE
RECOMMENDATION FOR INITIAL STANDARDS TO BEGIN PILOT TESTING
4 Evaluating HRPPP Pilot Accreditation Programs
References
Appendixes
APPENDIX A Data Sources and Methods
PRESENTATIONS AND PUBLIC COMMENT
LITERATURE REVIEW
DRAFT STANDARDS FOR ACCREDITATION
APPENDIX B PRIM&amp
R Accreditation Standards
INTRODUCTION
GOALS
PRINCIPLES UNDERLYING THE PROTECTION OF HUMANS STUDIED IN RESEARCH
GLOSSARY
PROPOSED STANDARDS
Section 1-Organizational Responsibilities
Section 2-Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)
Section 3-Investigators and Other Research Personnel
PUBLICATIONS CITED IN ACCREDITATION STANDARDS
APPENDIX C VA Human Research Protection Accreditation Program Draft Accreditation Standards
BACKGROUND
SOURCE OF STANDARDS
ORGANIZATION OF THE STANDARDS
OPERATION OF ACCREDITATION PROGRAM
PROGRAM COMPONENTS UNDER DEVELOPMENT
APPENDIX D Committee, Expert Adviser, and Staff Biographies
EXPERT ADVISERS
LIAISONS
STUDY STAFF
IOM BOARD ON HEALTH SCIENCES POLICY STAFF
CONSULTANT
Index.
Notes:
Bibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN:
9786610184842
9780309171090
0309171091
9781280184840
1280184841
9780309569910
0309569915
OCLC:
51820950

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

Find

Home Release notes

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Find catalog Using Articles+ Using your account