My Account Log in

3 options

Evaluating and improving undergraduate teaching in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics / Marye Anne Fox and Norman Hackerman, editors ; Committee on Recognizing, Evaluating, and Rewarding Undergraduate Teaching, Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education National Research Council.

EBSCOhost Academic eBook Collection (North America) Available online

View online

Ebook Central Academic Complete Available online

View online

National Academies Press Available online

View online
Format:
Book
Contributor:
Fox, Marye Anne, 1947-
Hackerman, Norman.
National Research Council (U.S.). Committee on Recognizing, Evaluating, and Rewarding Undergraduate Teaching.
Language:
English
Subjects (All):
Science--Study and teaching--Evaluation.
Science.
College teaching--Evaluation.
College teaching.
Physical Description:
xiv, 215 p.
Edition:
1st ed.
Place of Publication:
Washington, D.C. : National Academy Press, c2003.
Language Note:
English
Summary:
Economic, academic, and social forces are causing undergraduate schools to start a fresh examination of teaching effectiveness. Administrators face the complex task of developing equitable, predictable ways to evaluate, encourage, and reward good teaching in science, math, engineering, and technology. Evaluating, and Improving Undergraduate Teaching in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics offers a vision for systematic evaluation of teaching practices and academic programs, with recommendations to the various stakeholders in higher education about how to achieve change. What is good undergraduate teaching? This book discusses how to evaluate undergraduate teaching of science, mathematics, engineering, and technology and what characterizes effective teaching in these fields. Why has it been difficult for colleges and universities to address the question of teaching effectiveness? The committee explores the implications of differences between the research and teaching cultures-and how practices in rewarding researchers could be transferred to the teaching enterprise. How should administrators approach the evaluation of individual faculty members? And how should evaluation results be used? The committee discusses methodologies, offers practical guidelines, and points out pitfalls. Evaluating, and Improving Undergraduate Teaching in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics provides a blueprint for institutions ready to build effective evaluation programs for teaching in science fields.
Contents:
Front Matter
Preface
Acknowledgments
Contents
Executive Summary
PART I What Is Known: Principles, Research Findings, and Implementation Issues
1 Recent Perspectives on Undergraduate Teaching and Learning
2 Characterizing and Mobilizing Effective Undergraduate Teaching
3 Aligning the Cultures of Research and Teaching in Higher Education
4 Evaluating Teaching in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics: Principles and Research Findings
PART II Applying What Is Known: Strategies for Evaluating Teaching Effectiveness
5 Evaluation Methodologies
6 Evaluation of Individual Faculty: Criteria and Benchmarks
7 Evaluation of Departmental Undergraduate Programs
8 Recommendations
References
Appendix A Selected Student Evaluation Instruments
Appendix B Samples of Questionnaires Used to Evaluate Undergraduate Student Learning
Appendix C Examples of Questions for Conducting Peer Evaluations of Teaching
Appendix D Biographical Sketches of Committee Members
Index.
Notes:
Includes index.
ISBN:
9786610185177
9780309132947
0309132940
9781280185175
1280185171
9780309512114
0309512115
OCLC:
52822423

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

Find

Home Release notes

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Find catalog Using Articles+ Using your account