My Account Log in

3 options

Improving undergraduate instruction in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics : report of a workshop / Steering Committee on Criteria and Benchmarks for Increased Learning from Undergraduate STEM Instruction, Committee on Undergraduate Science Education, Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education ; Richard A. McCray, Robert L. DeHaan, and Julie Anne Schuck, editors.

EBSCOhost Academic eBook Collection (North America) Available online

View online

Ebook Central Academic Complete Available online

View online

National Academies Press Available online

View online
Format:
Book
Contributor:
McCray, Richard.
DeHaan, Robert L. (Robert Lawrence), 1930-
Schuck, Julie Anne.
National Research Council (U.S.). Steering Committee on Criteria and Benchmarks for Increased Learning from Undergraduate STEM Instruction.
Language:
English
Subjects (All):
Science--Study and teaching (Higher)--United States--Evaluation--Congresses.
Science.
Technical education--United States--Evaluation--Congresses.
Technical education.
Engineering--Study and teaching (Higher)--United States--Evaluation--Congresses.
Engineering.
Mathematics--Study and teaching (Higher)--United States--Evaluation--Congresses.
Mathematics.
Physical Description:
1 online resource (176 p.)
Edition:
1st ed.
Place of Publication:
Washington, DC : National Academies Press, c2003.
Language Note:
English
Summary:
Participants in this workshop were asked to explore three related questions: (1) how to create measures of undergraduate learning in STEM courses; (2) how such measures might be organized into a framework of criteria and benchmarks to assess instruction; and (3) how such a framework might be used at the institutional level to assess STEM courses and curricula to promote ongoing improvements. The following issues were highlighted: Effective science instruction identifies explicit, measurable learning objectives. Effective teaching assists students in reconciling their incomplete or erroneous preconceptions with new knowledge. Instruction that is limited to passive delivery of information requiring memorization of lecture and text contents is likely to be unsuccessful in eliciting desired learning outcomes. Models of effective instruction that promote conceptual understanding in students and the ability of the learner to apply knowledge in new situations are available. Institutions need better assessment tools for evaluating course design and effective instruction. Deans and department chairs often fail to recognize measures they have at their disposal to enhance incentives for improving education. Much is still to be learned from research into how to improve instruction in ways that enhance student learning.
Contents:
Identifying desired student learning outcomes
Evaluating effective instruction
Promoting effective instruction at departmental and institutional levels
General discussion.
Notes:
Bibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph
Includes bibliographical references.
ISBN:
0-309-16795-7
1-280-17975-9
9786610179756
0-309-50968-8
OCLC:
53015037

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

Find

Home Release notes

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Find catalog Using Articles+ Using your account