My Account Log in

3 options

Peer review in environmental technology development programs : the Department of Energy's Office of Science and Technology / Committee on the Department of Energy-Office of Science and Technology's Peer Review Program [and] Board on Radioactive Waste Management [and] Commission on Geosciences, Environment, and Resources, National Research Council.

EBSCOhost Academic eBook Collection (North America) Available online

View online

Ebook Central Academic Complete Available online

View online

National Academies Press Available online

View online
Format:
Book
Contributor:
National Research Council (U.S.). Committee on the Department of Energy-Office of Science and Technology's Peer Review Program.
National Research Council (U.S.). Board on Radioactive Waste Management.
National Research Council (U.S.). Commission on Geosciences, Environment, and Resources.
Series:
Compass series (Washington, D.C.)
The compass series
Language:
English
Subjects (All):
Radioactive waste sites--Cleanup--Technological innovations--Research--United States--Evaluation.
Radioactive waste sites.
Peer review--United States.
Peer review.
United States. Department of Energy. Office of Science and Technology--Research--Evaluation.
United States.
Physical Description:
1 online resource (126 p.)
Edition:
1st ed.
Place of Publication:
Washington, D.C. : National Academy Press, 1998.
Language Note:
English
Contents:
Peer Review in Environmental Technology Development Programs
Copyright
Preface
Contents
Executive Summary
DEFINITION OF PEER REVIEW
BENEFITS OF PEER REVIEW
Improving Technical Quality
Improving the Credibility of the Decision-Making Process
PEER REVIEW PROCESS
USES OF PEER REVIEW
ASSESSMENT OF OST'S PEER REVIEW PROGRAM
Linkage of Peer Reviews to Management Decisions
Selection of Projects for Review
Review Criteria
Selection of Reviewers
Documentation for Peer Reviews
Openness of Peer Reviews
REDUCING THE "BACKLOG
EVALUATION AND IMPROVEMENT MECHANISMS
POTENTIAL APPLICATIONS OF PEER REVIEW WITHIN OST
OST'S "ORGANIZATIONAL" CULTURE AND LEADERSHIP
1 Introduction
OST'S PEER REVIEW PROGRAM
CHARGE TO THE COMMITTEE
PARALLEL EFFORTS
STUDY PROCESS
REPORTS
2 Elements of a Credible Peer Review Program
Selection of Projects to be Reviewed
Definition of Review Objectives and Selection of Review Criteria
Qualifications
Conflict of Interest
Planning and Conducting the Review
Confidentiality of Technical Information
Anonymous Versus "Open" Peer Reviews
Use of Peer Review Results in Decision Making
3 Uses of Peer Review
PROPOSAL EVALUATIONS
PROJECT MATURITY EVALUATIONS
Entrance into the Applied Research Stage
Entrance into Engineering Development
Entrance into the Demonstration Stage
Predeployment Reviews
PROGRAM BALANCE EVALUATIONS
NEEDS DETERMINATIONS
4 OST's Peer Review Program
TECHNOLOGY INVESTMENT DECISION MODEL
ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
Peer Review Coordinator
Headquarters Peer Review Program Manager.
FA/CC Program Managers
Principal Investigators
American Society of Mechanical Engineers
ASME Peer Review Committee and its Executive Panel
Peer Review Panels
Institute for Regulatory Science
SELECTION OF TECHNOLOGIES TO BE REVIEWED
DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED FOR REVIEW
TYPES OF REVIEWS
SELECTION OF REVIEWERS
Selection Criteria
Panel Formation
REVIEW CRITERIA
REVIEW SESSION
REVIEW REPORTS
FEEDBACK OF PEER REVIEW RESULTS INTO PROGRAM MANAGEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DECISIONS
5 Analysis of OST's Peer Review Program
Selection of Projects for Peer Review
Prioritizing Projects for Review
Timing of Reviews
Grouping Projects in a Single Review
Definition of Peer Review Objectives and Selection of Review Criteria
Peer Review Objectives
Peer Review Criteria
Selection of Peer Reviewers
Planning and Conducting the Peer Review
Documentation
Anonymous Versus ''Open'' Peer Reviews
Usefulness of Peer Review Results
Peer Review Reports
Feedback Procedures
6 "Triage" Approach for Reducing Project Backlogs
7 Improving the Effectiveness of OST's Peer Review Program
LINKAGE OF PEER REVIEWS TO MANAGEMENT DECISIONS
Benchmarking
Metrics
POTENTIAL APPLICATION OF PEER REVIEW WITHIN OST
References
Appendix A Description of OST's Technology Investment Decision Model1
Stage 1: Basic Research
Gate 1: Entrance into Applied Research Stage
Stage 2: Applied Research
Gate 2: Entrance into Exploratory Development Stage.
Stage 3: Exploratory Development
Gate 3: Entrance into Advanced Development Stage
Stage 4: Advanced Development
Gate 4: Entrance into Engineering Development Stage
Stage 5: Engineering Development
Gate 5: Entrance into Demonstration Stage
Stage 6: Demonstration
Gate 6: Entrance into Implementation Stage
Stage 7: Implementation
Appendix B Description of OST's Review Program1
Department-Level Reviews
Program-Level Reviews
Project-Level Reviews
Appendix C Biographical Sketches
Appendix D Acronyms.
Notes:
Bibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph
Includes bibliographical references (p. 94-96).
ISBN:
9786610186167
9781280186165
128018616X
9780309592673
0309592674
9780585154008
0585154007
OCLC:
43477221

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

Find

Home Release notes

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Find catalog Using Articles+ Using your account