3 options
Toxicity of military smokes and obscurants / Subcommittee on Military Smokes and Obscurants, Committee on Toxicology, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Commission on Life Sciences, National Research Council.
- Format:
- Book
- Author/Creator:
- National Research Council (U.S.). Subcommittee on Military Smokes and Obscurants.
- Series:
- Compass series (Washington, D.C.)
- Compass series
- Language:
- English
- Subjects (All):
- Combustion gases--Toxicology.
- Combustion gases.
- Smoke screens--Toxicology.
- Smoke screens.
- Diesel fuels--Toxicology.
- Diesel fuels.
- Hexachloroethane--Toxicology.
- Hexachloroethane.
- Physical Description:
- 1 online resource (107 p.)
- Edition:
- 1st ed.
- Place of Publication:
- Washington, D.C. : National Academy Press, 1997-<c1999>
- Language Note:
- English
- Summary:
- A variety of smokes and obscurants have been developed and used to screen armed forces from view, signal friendly forces, and mark positions. Smokes are produced by burning or vaporizing particular products. Obscurants are anthropogenic or naturally occurring particles suspended in the air. They block or weaken transmission of particular parts of the electromagnetic spectrum, such as visible and infrared radiation or microwaves. Fog, mist, and dust are examples of natural obscurants. White phosphorus and hexachloroethane smokes are examples of anthropogenic obscurants. The U.S. Army seeks to reduce the likelihood that exposure to smokes and obscurants during training would have adverse health effects on military personnel or civilians. To protect the health of exposed individuals, the Office of the Army Surgeon General requested that the National Research Council (NRC) independently review data on the toxicity of smokes and obscurants and recommend exposure guidance levels for military personnel in training and for the general public residing or working near military-training facilities.
- Contents:
- Toxicity of Military Smokes and Obscurants
- Copyright
- OTHER REPORTS OF THE BOARD ON ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES AND TOXICOLOGY
- OTHER REPORTS OF THE COMMITTEE ON TOXICOLOGY
- Preface
- Contents
- SUMMARY
- SUBSTANCES EVALUATED
- Old Smoke Formulations
- New Smoke Formulations
- Individual Dye Components
- CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- 1 Introduction
- THE SUBCOMMITTEE'S TASK
- SMOKES REVIEWED IN THIS REPORT
- Composition of the Colored Smokes
- OLD M18 GRENADES
- NEW M18 GRENADES
- Combustion Chemistry
- Combustion Products
- U.S. ARMY POLICY ON USE OF COLORED SMOKES
- DEFINITIONS OF EXPOSURE GUIDANCE LEVELS
- APPROACH FOR RECOMMENDING EXPOSURE GUIDANCE LEVELS
- ORGANIZATION OF THE REPORT
- REFERENCES
- 2 Old Smoke Formulations
- YELLOW-SMOKE FORMULATION
- Composition
- Toxicokinetics
- Toxicity of the Smoke Formulation and Its Combustion Products
- Toxicity of Component Dyes
- GREEN-SMOKE FORMULATION
- RED-SMOKE FORMULATION
- VIOLET-SMOKE FORMULATION
- OVERALL EVALUATION OF TOXICITY
- PREVIOUS RECOMMENDED EXPOSURE LIMITS
- SUBCOMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS
- 3 New Smoke Formulations
- Combustion Products.
- Toxicokinetics
- Appendix A Benzanthrone
- BACKGROUND
- TOXICOKINETICS
- TOXICITY SUMMARY
- Effects in Humans
- Effects in Animals
- ONE-TIME EXPOSURE
- REPEATED EXPOSURE
- CARCINOGENICITY AND MUTAGENICITY
- SUBCOMMITTEE EVALUATION OF DYE TOXICITY
- Appendix B Vat Yellow 4
- Appendix C Solvent Yellow 33
- DERMAL EXPOSURES
- INHALATION EXPOSURES
- ORAL EXPOSURES
- MUTAGENICITY STUDIES
- Appendix D Solvent Green 3
- REPEATED EXPOSURES
- Appendix E Solvent Red 1
- Mutagenicity
- Appendix F Disperse Red 9
- DERMAL EXPOSURE
- INHALATION EXPOSURE
- OCULAR EXPOSURE
- ORAL EXPOSURE.
- MUTAGENICITY AND CARCINOGENICITY STUDIES
- Appendix G Disperse Red 11
- Appendix H 1,4-Diamino-2,3-Dihydroanthraquinone
- Mutagenicity Studies
- Appendix I 1,4-Diaminoanthraquinone
- REFERENCES.
- Notes:
- Bibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph
- Includes bibliographical references.
- ISBN:
- 0-309-18429-0
- 1-280-18579-1
- 9786610185795
- 0-309-59361-1
- 0-585-14956-9
- OCLC:
- 60365398
The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.