My Account Log in

3 options

Research on sentencing [electronic resource] : Volume II : the search for reform / Alfred Blumstein ... [et al.], editors ; Panel on Sentencing Research, Committee on Research on Law Enforcement and the Administration of Justice, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Research Council.

EBSCOhost Academic eBook Collection (North America) Available online

View online

Ebook Central Academic Complete Available online

View online

National Academies Press Available online

View online
Format:
Book
Author/Creator:
National Research Council Staff, Corporate Author.
Contributor:
National Research Council (U.S.)
Blumstein, Alfred.
Language:
English
Subjects (All):
Sentences (Criminal procedure)--United States.
Sentences (Criminal procedure).
Sentences (Criminal procedure)--United States--States.
Physical Description:
1 online resource
Edition:
1st ed.
Place of Publication:
Washington, D.C. : National Academy Press, 1983-
Language Note:
English
Contents:
Research on Sentencing
Copyright
Contents
Preface
1-Making Sense of Sentencing-A Review and Critique of Sentencing Research
TWO INCIPIENT THEORIES OF SENTENCING
DEFINITIONAL PROBLEMS IN SENTENCING RESEARCH
METHODOLOGICAL PROBLEMS IN SENTENCING RESEARCH
Alternative Measures of Sentence Severity
Sampling Problems
Measurement of Legitimized Influences on Criminal Sentencing
Measurement of Nonlegitimized Influences on Sentencing
Measurement of Contextual Effects
THE PROBLEM OF CUMULATION
RACE AND SENTENCING
Clarke and Koch (1977)
Gibson (1978)
Hagan and Bernstein (1979)
Kelly (1976)
LaFree (1980)
Lizotte (1978)
Myers (1979)
Pope (1975)
Thomson and Zingraff (1981)
Unnever, Frazier, and Henretta (1980)
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS
REFERENCES
2-Discrimination in the Criminal Justice System-A Critical Appraisal of the Literature
INTRODUCTION
(1) The Absence of Formal Models of Processing Decisions in the Criminal Justice System
(2) Sample Selection Biases Resulting from Screening and Processing Decisions
(3) Use of Arbitrary Scales to Measure Qualitatively Different Dispositions
ORGANIZATION OF THE PAPER
THE ANALYSIS OF BINARY VARIABLES
SELECTION
Selection Bias
Selection Bias at Different Processing Stages of the Criminal Justice System
Procedures to Deal with Selection Bias
A MODEL OF THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM
Background Discussion of the Model
Trial and Sentencing
Plea Bargaining
The Decision to Charge
The Model of the Decision to Prosecute, Plea Bargaining, and Conviction and Sentencing
REVIEW OF SELECTED STUDIES
Sample Selection Bias
Mixing Guilty Pleas and Trial Convictions
Mixing Outcomes
GENERALIZED MODELS OF SENTENCING
Two Models of Sentencing Decisions
Latent Variable Model of Sentencing.
An Alternative Model of the Sentencing Decision
Modeling Indeterminate Sentences
EXPERIMENTS IN SENTENCING RESEARCH
CONCLUSIONS
Appendix
NOTES
3-The Role of Extralegal Factors in Determining Criminal Case Disposition
EMPIRICAL STUDIES OF DISCRIMINATION IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM
Case Disposition and Sentencing Studies
(1) Seriousness of the Offense
(2) Prior Record
(3) Type of Legal Representation
(4) Release on Bail
(5) Type of Conviction
(6) Miscellaneous Factors
(7) Discriminatory or Extralegal Factors
The Conviction Process
The Plea Decision
Release on Bail
Setting of Bail
Choice of Legal Representation
The Charge Decision
The Decision to Prosecute
Summary of the Major Findings
BIASES INDUCED BY MEASUREMENT ERROR AND OMITTED VARIABLES
The Statistical Consequences of Failing to Control Adequately for the Primary Determinants
Correlations Between the Primary Determinants and Extralegal Variables
Alternative Interpretations of Results Reported in the Literature
Future Research Directions
AN ILLUSTRATIVE STRUCTURAL MODEL OF CRIMINAL CASE DISPOSITIONS
ESTIMABILITY OF THE PARAMETERS OF THE ILLUSTRATIVE STRUCTURAL MODEL
HOW THE ILLUSTRATIVE STRUCTURAL MODEL ALLOWS DISENTANGLING THE VARIOUS SOURCES OF RACE-OUTCOME CORRELATIONS: A HEURISTIC…
IDENTIFICATION IN LATENT VARIABLE MODELS WITH SAMPLE SELECTION
ADDITIONAL SPECIFICATION ISSUES
CONCLUDING REMARKS
4-Empirically Based Sentencing Guidelines and Ethical Considerations
THE SIMPLEST CASE: NO ETHICALLY IRRELEVANT VARIABLES
THE PRESENCE OF A SINGLE ETHICALLY IRRELEVANT VARIABLE: THE LINEAR CASE
NONLINEARITIES AND MORE THAN ONE ETHICALLY IRRELEVANT VARIABLE
CONCLUSION
NOTES.
5-The Construction of Sentencing Guidelines-A Methodological Critique
THE CONCEPT OF DECISION-MAKING GUIDELINES
(1) Ranges Rather than Points
(2) Nonmandatory Ranges
THE DESCRIPTION OF PAST SENTENCING PRACTICE
PROBLEMS OF MODEL DEVELOPMENT
Step (1)
Step (2)
Step (3)
How Many Models?
What Variables Should Be Included?
FROM MODELS TO GUIDELINES
The Decision to Incarcerate
Widths of Prescribed "Normal" Ranges
ASSESSING THE STRUCTURE AND IMPACT OF GUIDELINES
6-The Politics of Sentencing Reform-Sentencing Guidelines in Pennsylvania and Minnesota
DISPARITY, SEVERITY, AND THE DISTRIBUTION OF AUTHORITY: CENTRAL ISSUES IN SENTENCING REFORM
LEGISLATIVE POLITICS AND SENTENCING REFORM
Minnesota
Pennsylvania
THE STATUTES AND THE MANDATES OF THE COMMISSIONS
INTERPRETING THE MANDATES AND CREATING GUIDELINES
Membership, Leadership, and Staff
The Guidelines: Construction Process and Their Content
Key Elements in Designing the Guidelines
THE POLITICS OF GUIDELINE DEVELOPMENT: THE ROLE OF INTEREST GROUPS
7-Sentencing Reforms and Their Impacts
Impacts Considered
Innovations Considered
ABOLITION OF PLEA BARGAINING
Plea Bargaining Ban in Alaska
Prosecutorial Involvement in Sentence Bargaining
Charge Bargaining and Other Circumvention
Consequences of the Ban on Case Processing
Screening
Dismissals of Cases
Method of Disposition
Sanctions Policies
Disposition Time
Conclusion
Participants' Reactions
Was the Ban a Good Thing?
Implications of the Alaska Experience
The "Hampton" County Charge Bargaining Ban
Dismissals
Sanctions
Practitioners' Reactions
Michigan
Dispositions.
Adaptive Responses
MANDATORY SENTENCING LAWS
Arrest and Case Screening
Dismissal and Conviction Rates
Sanctioning Rates
Trial Rates
Massachusetts
Arrests and Prosecutorial Screening
Dismissal and Conviction
Sanctions and Delay
New York
Dismissal
Incarceration Rates
Severity of Prison Sentences
Delays in Court
DETERMINATE SENTENCING IN CALIFORNIA
Description of the California Uniform Determinate Sentencing Law
Formal Compliance With DSL
Selection of Base Terms
Enhancements
Probation Ineligibility
Charging
Plea Bargaining After DSL
Patterns and Trends in Plea Bargaining
Guilty Plea Rates
Timing of Guilty Pleas
Variations in Plea Bargaining Practices
Impact on Prison Use
Trends in Prison Use
Factors Contributing to Increased Prison Use
Changes in Probation Subsidies
Changes in Case Filtering
Demographic Changes
Increases in Punitiveness
Impact on Length of Terms
Length of Prison Terms
Variability in Prison Terms
Implications for the Size of the Prison Population
Conclusions
SENTENCING GUIDELINES
Guideline Types
Formal Compliance
Voluntary/Descriptive Guidelines
Presumptive/Prescriptive Guidelines
Variability in Sentences
Case Processing
Prison Use
PAROLE REFORMS
Parole Abolition
Parole Guidelines
Severity
Accuracy
Variability
Disparity Reduction
Substantive Findings
Procedural Compliance
Adaptive Responses
Marginal Cases
Methodological Concerns
The Necessity for Extended Observation Periods
The Necessity for Outcome Measures at All Levels of Case Processing
The Necessity for Adequate Controls for Changes in Case Attributes
The Necessity for Qualitative Analysis of System Functioning
REFERENCES
8-The Impact of Changes in Sentencing Policy on Prison Populations
THE NEED FOR ESTIMATES
PROJECTION OF FUTURE PRISON POPULATIONS AS A BASELINE FOR THE IMPACT ESTIMATE
Naive Projection-Current Situation as a Baseline
Extrapolation of the Time Series of Prison Populations
Multivariate Regression
Projections Based on Demographic-Specific Incarceration Rates
Disaggregated Flow Models
Microsimulation Models
IMPACT ESTIMATION
Identification of Population Subsets
Establishment of Values of Policy Variables
Behavioral Response to the New Policy
Calculation of the Effects of the Sentencing Policy Change
Estimation of the Impact of a Mandatory Minimum Sentencing Bill
SUMMARY AND FURTHER RESEARCH NEEDS
REFERENCES.
Notes:
Bibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph
Includes bibliographies.
ISBN:
9786610245949
9781280245947
1280245948
9780309567855
0309567858
9780585182179
0585182175
OCLC:
923270743

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

Find

Home Release notes

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Find catalog Using Articles+ Using your account