My Account Log in

3 options

Affordable cleanup? : opportunities for cost reduction in the decontamination and decommissioning of the nation's uranium enrichment facilities / Committee on Decontamination and Decommissioning of Uranium Enrichment Facilities, Board on Energy and Environmental Systems, Commission on Engineering and Technical Systems, National Research Council.

EBSCOhost Academic eBook Collection (North America) Available online

View online

Ebook Central Academic Complete Available online

View online

National Academies Press Available online

View online
Format:
Book
Contributor:
National Research Council (U.S.). Committee on Decontamination and Decommissioning of Uranium Enrichment Facilities.
Language:
English
Subjects (All):
Radioactive waste sites--Cleanup--United States--Cost control.
Radioactive waste sites.
Nuclear facilities--Decommissioning--United States--Cost control.
Nuclear facilities.
Physical Description:
1 online resource (323 p.)
Edition:
1st ed.
Place of Publication:
Washington, D.C. : National Academy Press, c1996.
Language Note:
English
Summary:
The Energy Policy Act of 1992 called on the National Academy of Sciences to conduct a study and provide recommendations for reducing the costs of decontaminating and decommissioning (D&D) the nation's uranium enrichment facilities located at Oak Ridge, Tennessee; Raducah, Kentucky; and Portsmouth, Ohio. This volume examines the existing plans and cost estimates for the D&D of these facilities, including such elements as technologies, planning and management, and identifies approaches that could reduce D&D costs. It also assesses options for disposition of the large quantities of depleted uranium hexafluoride that are stored at these sites.
Contents:
Affordable Cleanup?
Copyright
Preface
Contents
Executive Summary
THE GDPS
D&amp
D COST ESTIMATES
THE UNCERTAIN CONTEXT
Final State of the Sites
Disposal of Waste
Criteria for Release of Decontaminated Materials
The D&amp
D Fund and Budgetary Uncertainties
Sequence of Plant Cleanup
Management of DUF6
RECOMMENDATIONS
Previous D&amp
D Experience
Contracting and Management
Need for New Facilities
Waste Management
Regulatory Coordination
Coordinated Planning
Stakeholder Involvement
Prioritized Cost and Risk Reduction
D Technology Issues
Safeguards and Security
DUF6
1 Introduction
STUDY BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES
THE U.S. URANIUM ENRICHMENT ENTERPRISE
THE UNITED STATES ENRICHMENT CORPORATION
THE D&amp
D FUND
THE CHALLENGES OF A D&amp
D EFFORT
D COSTS
ORGANIZATION OF THE REPORT
REFERENCES
2 The GDP Sites: Process, Facilities, Inventories, and Risks
THE GASEOUS DIFFUSION PROCESS
SITE DESCRIPTIONS
BUILDINGS AND EQUIPMENT
CONTAMINATION
Radiological Contamination
Nonradioactive Contamination
STORAGE OF DUF6
SITE DIFFERENCES
RISKS SUBSEQUENT TO GDP CLOSURE
CONCLUSIONS
3 Decontamination Processes
INTRODUCTION
NUCLEAR CRITICALITY
URANIUM DEPOSIT REMOVAL
Gaseous Removal of Deposits
Mechanical Removal
Aqueous Spray Removal
DECONTAMINATION OF CASCADE EQUIPMENT
Disassembly
Aqueous Decontamination
DECONTAMINATION OF SUPPORT SYSTEMS AND BUILDINGS
Radioactively Contaminated Support Systems
Radioactively Contaminated Interior Building Surfaces
Removal of Nonradioactive Hazardous Material
WASTE MANAGEMENT
CHARACTERIZATION
Radionuclide Measurement Techniques
Hazardous Nonradioactive Materials
AUTOMATION AND ROBOTICS.
CAPENHURST TECHNOLOGIES
Removal of Uranium from the Capenhurst Enrichment Cascades
Decontamination of Equipment from the Capenhurst Cascades
Decontamination of Supporting Systems and Building Surfaces
Characterization
General Considerations
CIP/CUP TECHNOLOGIES
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
General
Conclusions
Recommendations
Uranium Deposit Removal
Recommendation
Decontamination of Cascade Equipment
Decontamination of Support Systems and Buildings
Conclusion
Waste Management and Recycling
Robotics
4 Analyses of the D&amp
D Cost Estimates for the GDPs
PREVIOUS COST ESTIMATES
The 1988 MMES Study
The 1991 Ebasco and TLG Estimates
Comparison of the Ebasco and TLG Estimates for the Five Process Buildings at the Oak Ridge GDP
SAIC Analysis of the Ebasco Estimate for DOE
IDENTIFICATION OF MAJOR COST ELEMENTS
TIME PROFILE OF INCOME AND EXPENDITURES FOR THE D&amp
ESTIMATING U.S. GDP D&amp
D COSTS FROM CAPENHURST D&amp
Capenhurst Plant Description
Capenhurst Project Description
Estimating Oak Ridge Costs by Scaling Capenhurst Costs
THE SHIPPINGPORT REACTOR D&amp
D PROJECT
D Cost Estimates
Cost to D&amp
D the GDPs
Adequacy of the D&amp
D Fund
Experience from Other D&amp
D Projects
5 Planning the D&amp
D Program
PUBLIC AND STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT
END-STATE ALTERNATIVES
Prioritized Cost- and Risk-Reduction Approach.
DEVELOPMENT OF AN INTEGRATED REGULATORY PROGRAM
Federal Regulations
DOE
EPA
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
OSHA
DOT
USEC Effects on Regulatory Oversight
EPA and Nuclear Regulatory Commission Development of Radiation Site Cleanup Regulation
State Regulation
Challenges and Current Developments
DOE-Level Planning
Complex-Level Planning
D Organization and Staffing
Plant Characterization Program
Regulatory Plan
Waste Management Plan
Site-Level Planning
Execution of the Planning
Scheduling and Sequencing
Effects of Early Plant Shutdown
Effects of D&amp
D Program Delay
MANAGEMENT ISSUES
Public and Stakeholder Involvement
Regulatory Issues
Planning
Management Issues
6 Opportunities for D&amp
D Cost Reduction
PROGRAM INTEGRATION
Management Approach
An Alternative Management Approach
Contracting Strategy
Contracting Cost
RADIOACTIVE AND HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT
Reducing Waste Quantity
Waste Disposal Site and Unit Disposal Cost
Waste Packaging, Transport, and Disposal
Risk That Waste Management Costs May Be Higher
Hazardous Waste Disposal Costs
DECONTAMINATION AND DECOMMISSIONING
Technology
Decontamination Process
Melting of Difficult-to-Decontaminate Components
Automation and Robotics
Building Decontamination and Removal
Use of Historical Maintenance Cost Data
SUPPORT FACILITIES
Decontamination Facilities
Eliminate the High-Assay Decontamination Facility
Simplify the Low-Assay Decontamination Facility Design
Use of Existing Buildings
Multiple Low-Assay Decontamination Facilities versus a Single Shared Facility
New Administration Building
COST ESTIMATE ASSUMPTIONS.
Learning Curve
Site Practices and Procedures
Safeguards, Security, and Classification
Criticality Prevention
Surveillance and Maintenance
Labor Agreements
SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Conclusions and Recommendations
7 Disposition of the DUF6
DUF6 INVENTORY
USES FOR DEPLETED URANIUM
Shielding Applications
Use as a Fluorinating Agent
Re-enrichment or Dilution
DUF6 Enrichment by AVLIS
Blending Agent
Potential Energy Resource for Reactors
DEPLETED URANIUM MANAGEMENT OPTIONS
Condition of Cylinders
Environmental, Safety, and Health Issues
Continued Surveillance and Maintenance: Requirements and Costs
Conversion Options and Costs
Assessment of Alternative Management Options
ANALYSIS OF COST ESTIMATES FOR CONVERSION
OPPORTUNITIES FOR COST SAVING
Plant Scale
Plant Life
Uranium Oxide Density
HF Production and Marketing
Use of Existing Facilities
New Technology
8 Major Recommendations
COORDINATED PLANNING
CONTRACTING AND MANAGEMENT
PRIORITIZED COST AND RISK REDUCTION
REGULATORY COORDINATION
STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT
NEED FOR NEW FACILITIES
D TECHNOLOGY ISSUES
SAFEGUARDS AND SECURITY
Appendices
Appendix A Statement of Task
Appendix B The Committee's Panel Structure and Panel Statement of Tasks
Decision And Process Analysis Panel
Technology Panel
Cost Analysis Panel
Appendix C Committee Meetings and Activities
Separate Panel Meetings
Site Visits and Symposiums Attended by Selected Members of the Committee and Staff
Appendix D Biographical Sketches of Committee Members and Staff
Staff.
Board on Energy and Environmental Studies
Board on Chemical Sciences and Technology
Board on Radioactive Waste Management
Appendix E Radionuclide Characterization and Detection
Radionuclides To Be Characterized
Radionuclide Characterization Processes
Initial or Scoping Measurements
Characterization During D&amp
D
Compliance Characterization
Radionuclide Characterization Instrumentation
Regulatory Requirements
References
Appendix F Automation and Robotics
Commercial Systems
Doe Programs
Appendix G Nuclear Criticality
Production And Loss of Neutrons
Avoiding Criticality
Summary
Appendix H Previous Decontamination and Decommissioning Efforts
Capenhurst Gaseous Diffusion Plant
Description of Capenhurst Facility
Approach
Development Activities
Decontamination and Disassembly
Gaseous Decontamination to Remove UO2F2
Removal of Nonradioactive Hazardous Materials
Equipment and Cell Structures Disassembly
Interim Storage of Plant Components
Size Reduction
Chemical Decontamination
Melting
Ancillary Structures Removal
Waste Treatment and Disposal
Personnel Protection During Decommissioning
Criticality Control
Air Monitoring
Similarities And Differences Between Capenhurst And The U.S. Enrichment Plants
Quantity Comparisons Of Capenhurst And The Oak Ridge Gdp
Appendix I Waste Treatment
Separations
Treatment Options
Recycling
Appendix J Review of Existing Cost Estimates
MMES Estimate
Ebasco Estimate
Assumptions
DOE-Directed Assumptions
Ebasco Assumptions
The Assumption of New High- and Low-Assay Decontamination Facilities
Analysis of the Ebasco Estimate
Comparison Of The 1988 MMES And 1991 Ebasco Studies
TLG Cost Estimate.
Saic Review.
Notes:
Bibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph
Includes bibliographical references.
ISBN:
9786610192342
9780309175876
0309175879
9781280192340
1280192348
9780309552981
0309552982
9780585002149
0585002142
OCLC:
726823017

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

Find

Home Release notes

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Find catalog Using Articles+ Using your account