1 option
A passion for specificity : confronting inner experience in literature and science / Marco Caracciolo and Russell T. Hurlburt ; with a foreword by Eric Schwitzgebel.
- Format:
- Book
- Author/Creator:
- Caracciolo, Marco, author.
- Hurlburt, Russell T., author.
- Series:
- Cognitive approaches to culture
- Language:
- English
- Subjects (All):
- Psychology and literature.
- Literature--Philosophy.
- Experience in literature.
- Literature and science.
- Introspection.
- Philosophy of mind.
- Physical Description:
- xi, 327 pages ; 24 cm.
- Place of Publication:
- Columbus : The Ohio State University Press, [2016]
- Summary:
- In an analytical yet increasingly intimate conversation, A Passion for Specificity: Confronting Inner Experience in Literature and Science investigates the differences between experience as conveyed in literature and experience as apprehended through scientific method. Can experiences be shared? How much do language and metaphor shape experiential reports? Where is the dividing line between a humanistic and a scientific approach to experience? In a series of exchanges, Marco Caracciolo and Russell T. Hurlburt demonstrate that those are necessarily personal issues, and they don't flinch-they relentlessly examine whether Caracciolo's presuppositions distort his understanding of reading experiences and whether Hurlburt's attachment to the method he invented causes him to take an overly narrow view of experience. Delving ever more personally, they aim Hurlburt's experience sampling methods-beeping people to discover what was in their stream of inner experience at the moment immediately before the beep-at Caracciolo's own experiences, an exercise that puts Caracciolo's presuppositions to the test and leads him to discover things about experience (his own and literature's) that he had thought impossible. A Passion for Specificity, with its personal revelations, unexpected twists, and confrontational style, reads like an epistolary novel, but it is a serious exploration of ideas at the heart of literature and science. It is a thoughtful attempt at advancing the emerging "cognitive humanities," clarifying a number of core issues in the cross-pollination of literature, psychology, philosophy, and consciousness science. Book jacket.
- Contents:
- In which Marco asks Russ about reading, but he responds about presuppositions
- Russ performs a small study that surprises Marco
- Russ presumes to identify Marco's presuppositions
- Marco's questionnaire and a "boot-like" sentence
- Contrasting broad experience and pristine experience, with Amsterdam as an example
- In which Marco sends Russ his paper on the experience of reading Mccarthy's The road; Russ hesitates but then critiques it
- Phenomena and how to explore them
- In which Marco rankles at Russ's emphasis on delusion, and they discuss the existence of experience
- Great Expectations and genies reveal something about knowing others' experience
- Pristine experience, broad experience, presuppositions, and tendencies; Russ challenges James Joyce
- On the adulteration of pristine experience
- Phenomena, adulteration, apples, and turkey
- Pristine experience: broad experience :: phenomena : not phenomena
- Phenomena, mental states, judgments, and hunger
- Getting even more personal
- Similarity and familiarity, scams, and the fight to the death
- Marco wears the beeper
- Ultimately personal: twenty-four moments of Marco's pristine experience
- A very small quibble on wording
- Salient characteristics of Marco's experience as characterized by Russ
- Two more quibbles on wording
- Where Russ transitions back to the general
- Feeling hooks inside one's chest; metaphor and experience
- Metaphor tables
- Retrospective prospections
- In lieu of a conclusion.
- Notes:
- Includes bibliographical references (pages 317-322) and index.
- ISBN:
- 9780814213209
- 0814213200
- OCLC:
- 945029849
- Online:
- Contributor biographical information
- Publisher description
The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.