1 option
Policy debates as dynamic networks : German pension politics and privatization discourse / Philip Leifeld.
Lippincott Library HD7105.35.G3 L45 2016
Available
- Format:
- Book
- Author/Creator:
- Leifeld, Philip, author.
- Series:
- Schriften des Zentrums für Sozialpolitik ; Bd. 29.
- Studies in Social Policy Research ; volume 29 = Schriften des Zentrums für Sozialpolitik ; Band 29
- Language:
- English
- Subjects (All):
- Pensions--Government policy--Germany--History--21st century.
- Pensions.
- Demographic transition--Germany--History--21st century.
- Demographic transition.
- Social reformers--Social networks--Germany--History--21st century.
- Social reformers.
- Older people--Government policy--Germany--History--21st century.
- Older people.
- Older people--Social networks--Germany--History--21st century.
- Social advocacy--Germany--History--21st century.
- Social advocacy.
- History.
- Older people--Social networks.
- Older people--Government policy.
- Social networks.
- Pensions--Government policy.
- Germany.
- Physical Description:
- xiv, 354 pages : illustrations ; 22 cm.
- Other Title:
- German pension politics and privatization discourse
- Place of Publication:
- Frankfurt ; New York : Campus Verlag, [2016]
- Summary:
- How do policy debates work? How can interest groups and legislators influence political processes through the media? This book introduces discourse network analysis as a methodological toolbox for the study of policy debates. With this set of methods, political discourse is cast as a temporal network of actors and their statements in the media over time. A case study applies discourse network analysis to the policy debate on old-age security in Germany. German pension politics is characterized by an increasing polarization of competing coalitions towards the end of the 1990s. Structural breaks in the discourse network can explain major policy change and a radical turn to privatization in 2001. Book jacket.
- Contents:
- I The Theory and Methodology of Discourse Networks
- 1 Introduction 3
- 2 Actor-centered approaches to discourse 7
- 2.1 The Advocacy Coalition Framework 9
- 2.2 Veto player analysis 16
- 2.3 Punctuated Equilibrium Theory 17
- 2.4 Policy paradigms and social learning 21
- 2.5 Collective symbolic coping 23
- 2.6 Civic arenas 25
- 2.7 Multiple streams 26
- 2.8 Argumentative discourse analysis and discourse coalitions 28
- 2.9 Epistemic communities 30
- 2.10 Comparison of actor-centered approaches 32
- 3 Content-oriented approaches to discourse 37
- 3.1 Critical discourse analysis 38
- 3.2 Category-based content analysis 40
- 3.3 Frame mapping and the co-occurrence approach 41
- 3.4 Clause-or grammar-based methods and knowledge graphs 43
- 3.5 Semantic networks 45
- 3.6 Comparison of content-oriented approaches 48
- 4 Hybrid approaches: linking actors and contents 53
- 4.1 Decomposition analysis 53
- 4.2 Political claims analysis 54
- 4.3 Conclusions for a new discourse methodology 57
- 4.4 Policy network analysis 60
- 5 The methodology of discourse network analysis 61
- 5.1 Coding procedure 61
- 5.2 Affiliation networks 62
- 5.3 Actor congruence networks 64
- 5.4 Concept congruence networks 69
- 5.5 Conflict networks 71
- 5.6 Time window networks 72
- 5.7 Attenuation networks 78
- 5.8 Software implementation 84
- 5.8.1 Encoding statements 84
- 5.8.2 Network export facilities 86
- II A Showcase: German Pension Politics, 1993-2001
- 6 German pension polities in the 1990s and the 2001 Riester reform 91
- 6.1 Dimensions of pension systems and the status quo in the 1990s 93
- 6.1.1 Pay-as-you-go versus capital cover systems 93
- 6.1.2 Public versus private pension systems 97
- 6.1.3 Voluntary versus mandatory contributions 98
- 6.1.4 Intra-generative redistribution versus equivalence 98
- 6.1.5 Risk balance 101
- 6.1.6 The pension formula 102
- 6.2 Demographic change and the pension gap 104
- 6.2.1 Demographic Transition as a complex long-term risk 105
- 6.2.2 Mortality 106
- 6.2.3 Fertility 107
- 6.2.4 Inconsistent solution concepts in the demographic debate 110
- 6.2.5 Migration 111
- 6.3 The 2001 Riester reform 112
- 6.3.1 The 1999 Pension Reform Act 112
- 6.3.2 Changes in the 2001 reform 113
- 6.4 Positive analyses of the policy outcome 117
- 7 Description of the dataset and univariate analysis 125
- 7.1 Coding procedure 125
- 7.2 Media bias and validity 128
- 7.2.1 Record coding 129
- 7.2.2 Data coding 133
- 7.2.3 Indexing 134
- 7.3 Actors in the pension discourse 134
- 7.3.1 Government 135
- 7.3.2 Social actors 136
- 7.3.3 Liberal actors 136
- 7.3.4 Financial sector 137
- 7.3.5 Young actors 137
- 7.3.6 Scientists 137
- 7.3.7 Other actors 137
- 7.4 Univariate analysis: concepts in the pension discourse 138
- 7.4.1 System change 140
- 7.4.2 Retrenchment within the PAYG paradigm 151
- 7.4.3 Strengthening the insurance principle 160
- 7.4.4 Increasing the number of contributors 167
- 8 Empirical analysis of the German pension discourse in the 1990s 183
- 8.1 Discourse activity over time 184
- 8.2 Cross-sectional actor congruence, 1993-2001 188
- 8.3 Longitudinal change 199
- 8.4 Analysis of political parties 209
- 8.5 Identification of ideologies 214
- 8.6 Discussion and conclusion 218
- III Models of Discursive Behavior
- 9 The contagious dimension of political discourse 225
- 9.1 Attention and interaction in media discourse 225
- 9.1.1 Discursive contagion in existing theories 226
- 9.1.2 Two types of contagion 227
- 9.1.3 Hypotheses 228
- 9.2 Methods and data 230
- 9.2.1 Operationalization 231
- 9.2.2 Support versus resistance 231
- 9.2.3 Exponential random graph models with dyadic dependence 232
- 9.2.4 Estimation 233
- 9.2.5 Dichotomization of edge weights 234
- 9.2.6 Control variables 234
- 9.2.7 Data 236
- 9.2.8 Potential caveats 237
- 9.3 Results and goodness of fit 239
- 9.4 Discussion 244
- 10 An agent-based model of political discourse 249
- 10.1 A formal model of political discourse 251
- 10.1.1 Definitions and basic setup 251
- 10.1.2 Exogenous ideology 252
- 10.1.3 Endogenous ideology 252
- 10.1.4 Concept popularity (bandwagoning) 252
- 10.1.5 Actor similarity (coalition formation) 253
- 10.1.6 Concept similarity 253
- 10.1.7 Actor's history (self-consistency) 254
- 10.1.8 Rare concepts (agenda-setting) 255
- 10.1.9 Government coherence 255
- 10.1.10 Normalization 256
- 10.1.11 Utility functions 257
- 10.2 Analysis 258
- 10.2.1 Measurement 258
- 10.2.2 Betweenness centralization 258
- 10.2.3 Ideological polarization 259
- 10.2.4 Number of components 261
- 10.2.5 Proportion of concepts still alive 261
- 10.2.6 Number of recent concept changes 262
- 10.3 Results 262
- 10.4 Discussion 272
- 11 Conclusion 275
- 11.1 Main achievements 275
- 11.2 Potential weaknesses 276
- 11.3 Outlook 278
- IV Appendix
- Laws and legislative decrees 283
- List of actors in the dataset 285
- Software manual 291
- 1 Installation 291
- 2 Tutorial for beginners 292
- 3 In-depth description 299
- 3.1 File format 299
- 3.2 Dealing with articles 300
- 3.3 Recoding statements 302
- 3.4 Regular expressions highlighter 302
- 3.5 Within-actor contradictions 303
- 3.6 The bottom bar 303
- 3.7 Exporting time series statistics 305
- 3.8 Exporting network data 307
- 4 rDNA. A Package to Control Discourse Network Analyzer from R 315
- 4.1 Motivation 315
- 4.2 Functionality 315
- 4.3 Examples 316
- 5 FAQ: Frequently Asked Questions 317.
- Notes:
- Originally presented as the author's thesis (doctoral)--Universität Konstanz, 2011.
- Includes bibliographical references (pages 321-349) and index.
- ISBN:
- 9783593505701
- 3593505703
- OCLC:
- 951561071
The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.